Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeAChooser
If no, then does Ashcroft has responsibility for investigating and prosecuting criminal matters of the sort uncovered?

Not on cases that have been disposed of, or that they have looked at -- including Klayman's "evidence" -- and have decided there is just nothing there??? And just because Klayman SAYS he has it doesn't mean other REPUTABLE ATTORNEYS WHO SEE KLAYMAN'S DEPOSITION MAY THINK THEY ARE CRIMINAL) and the designated people at the DOJ have ruled they are NOT criminal cases to be prosecuted, for whatever reason, whether YOU agree with their opinions or not!

Much as it kills you and Klayman, he is NOT in charge of deciding what IS and what IS NOT criminal.

858 posted on 04/24/2002 3:51:06 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
"If no, then does Ashcroft has responsibility for investigating and prosecuting criminal matters of the sort uncovered?"

Not on cases that have been disposed of, or that they have looked at -- including Klayman's "evidence" -- and have decided there is just nothing there???

There you have it folks. Clear proof that Howlin is not a conservative as she PRETENDS to be but a democRAT.

Who but a democRAT would claim that the allegations of Chinagate have been looked at and that there is nothing there?

Who but a democRAT would claim that Filegate was fairly looked at (remember, those files were STILL in the Clinton Whitehouse YEARS after Starr told us that it was illegal for the Whitehouse to have them and the Whitehouse told us they had been returned) and there was nothing there.

Who but a democRAT who claim that the email case was properly investigated and there was nothing there ... given that multiple people (ordinary folks like us Freepers) were threatened with jail by Clintons henchmen if they revealed the missing emails ... given that a huge number of the emails which Klayman's actions managed to recover have apparently NEVER been looked at by anyone in an investigative manner.

Again, we must thank Howlin for finally clearing up our suspicions about whether she's a democRAT or not. She is!

And just because Klayman SAYS he has it doesn't mean other REPUTABLE ATTORNEYS WHO SEE KLAYMAN'S DEPOSITION MAY THINK THEY ARE CRIMINAL) and the designated people at the DOJ have ruled they are NOT criminal cases to be prosecuted, for whatever reason, whether YOU agree with their opinions or not!

Cite the ruling. Name those Attorneys. Name those designated people. Does the fact that you can't mean there's STILL "no controlling authority"? Provide ONE indication that the matters Klayman discovered and investigated in Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate and the like were EVER looked into by ANYONE in the Bush administration. All we ever heard about were investigations closing down without ANY reason being given. Keep on SPINNING Howlin.

Tell us Howlin, if Filegate has been resolved, then you should be able to tell us how many files were taken, whose they were, where they are now and whether the information in those files is still on DNC computers? Can you? Of course not, because you are doing nothing but spreading disinformation and playing deny, deny, deny ... that favorite game of democRATS.

1,020 posted on 04/24/2002 9:38:10 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson