One thing that you will find out, if you haven't already, is that Larry Klayman's detractors love to insert sparse facts on these Judicial Watch Threads for the sole purpose of mud-slinging and discrediting Larry as a person.
First of all, Larry Klayman had every right to file suit against his mother; this was an obvious last resort for him. Larry Klayman sued his mother because she and his stepfather embezzled money that was intended for his grandmother's healthcare. The lawsuit was intended to be kept private, as it was a last resort to try to get his mother to pay back the money she stole.
Second, the lawsuit was intended to be kept private, in matter of speaking. Larry kept his name off the title of the lawsuit by filing it under the auspices of another name, Accounts Inc. After Newsweek Magazine ran a polemic piece about this lawsuit for the sole purpose of trying to smear Larry's reputation, Judicial Watch then ran a press release stating the facts of the case, as to not let Judicial Watch detractors and smearers get another final word in otherwise, or gossip about Judicial Watch wrongly.
Yep, and folks many folks here like sinkspur and Howlhollaring do this all the time! HUH Howlhollaring!
Apparently, the suit against his mother was based upon the Larry's claim that his grandmother had given money to his mother for the grandmother's medical care and Larry wanted that money.
Larry's mother provided a different account under oath:
"I did not in March 1997, promise Larry Klayman that I would pay him for any medical or other expenses he might incur on behalf of my mother Yetta Goldberg. On the contrary, on that occasion, Larry Klayman was verbally abusive to me and to my aunt (Yetta Goldberg's sister), which forced us to leave his house and go to a hotel for the night. Moreover, on this occasion, Larry Klayman's wife, Stephanie Klayman, was crying while Larry Klayman was screaming at my aunt and me."
Obviously, this matter causes me a great deal of concern. What else should I know about this case?