Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeAChooser
having to defend Slate and the Washington Post as reliable sources.

For the second time, paste right here on this thread where I defended either one of them.

1,110 posted on 04/25/2002 10:24:30 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
ROFL !!!!!! I have seen my share of outrageously ridiculous people here, but I see that you have attracted one of the stars.

He'll never have a clue, but you were spot on about the other 70,000 people. Thankfully they DO ignore this guy and his few cronies.

There ought to be a name for these characters. Most of us know the standouts. It becomes common knowledge after one has freeped for a little while. Maybe they could insert little rolling eyeballs next to the screennames of kooks.

1,112 posted on 04/25/2002 10:36:37 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
For the second time, paste right here on this thread where I defended either one of them.

I don't have to, Howlin, you already did. You are the one who introduced them into this thread. I've asked you many times to indicate the sources of information you consider reliable and you have NEVER responded. I don't think it is coincidence that the first time you actually do provide sources to back up something you claim, they are a left-leaning magazine and a left-leaning website. You can play your "definition of IS" and "EXACTLY" games all you want. I'm not going to play them with you anymore. The INTENT of what you post is ALL that matters.

1,121 posted on 04/25/2002 11:00:16 AM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson