Replies

Houston Chronicle CHAVEZ'S REVOLUTION: Egomaniacal power grab disgusted most Venezuelans [Full Text] When Hugo Chavez won a landslide election victory to the presidency three years ago, he enjoyed the good will of the vast majority of Venezuelans and many democratically minded people throughout the world. Finally, it was hoped, here would be a leader who would improve the lot of all Venezuelans, most of whom lived in terrible poverty despite the fact that Venezuela is a rich nation by virtue of being the world's fourth-largest exporter of oil.

But the charismatic former paratroop colonel, who had staged a failed military coup in 1992, betrayed the voters and proved to be more of a pompous, left-leaning egomaniac than a true democrat. His international friends were Fidel Castro, to whom he agreed to ship oil at a cut-rate cost, Saddam Hussein and very probably Colombia's leftist guerrillas. He turned his back on the United States, although Venezuela remained this country's No. 3 supplier of imported oil.

Friday Chavez either resigned his presidency or was forced from power by Venezuelan military commanders following a national strike and mass march in Caracas that resulted in at least a dozen demonstrators being killed and an estimated 250 wounded. His approval ratings had plunged from 80 percent to 30 percent, even among the poorest of Venezuelans who had once been his strongest supporters.

In effect, the revolution had eaten its young. Power had corrupted. Domestically, Chavez grabbed for power with both hands. He put his old military friends into high positions. He muzzled and intimidated Venezuela's free press, got rid of honest judges along with some corrupt ones, rewrote the constitution and attacked middle-class businessmen, the Roman Catholic Church and labor leaders. He set the nation's state oil monopoly on a path to ruin.

Chavez's revolution turned out to be a lost chance to fix the many wrongs that plague the ordinary citizens of Venezuela. But the former colonel betrayed the people, as do most leaders who seek absolute power.

It is unclear where Venezuela will go from this point. Pedro Carmona, the interim leader who heads the country's largest business association, has promised new presidential and legislative elections within a year.

The future of Venezuelans depends on the rule of law, honest judges, a free press, a more transparent government and a renewed dedication to the principle that all Venezuelans should be treated fairly and humanely and with dignity. On this, history must wait. [End]

"But the charismatic former paratroop colonel, who had staged a failed military coup in 1992, betrayed the voters and proved to be more of a pompous, left-leaning egomaniac than a true democrat."

But I thought true democrats ARE pompous, left-leaning egomaniacs !

In effect, the revolution had eaten its young. Power had corrupted. Domestically, Clinton grabbed for power with both hands. He put his old military friends into high positions. He muzzled and intimidated America's leftist free press, got rid of honest judges along with some corrupt ones, rewrote the constitution and attacked middle-class businessmen, the Roman Catholic Church and labor leaders. He set the nation's U. S. Attorney's on a path to ruin. I thought they were talking about the big creep.