Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/09/2002 1:56:05 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RCW2001
they adopted a stray dog and named it "George W. Bush". "He's a cowboy," one soldier said as the brown pit-bull terrier prowled an Israeli hilltop encampment overlooking the city of Nablus. "He barks a lot," said a second. "But he's useless," another chimed in.

Haha... wow... truth hurts sometimes. Remember CFR?

2 posted on 04/09/2002 2:00:55 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Ever notice that most articles from Reuters are written by a--holes and take every opportunity to bash conservatives?
3 posted on 04/09/2002 2:01:32 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
"If the U.S. had this problem of terrorism, they wouldn't ask for permission. They would finish the job like they did in Afghanistan,"

Yep. We need to leave Isreal alone and let them finish their job.

4 posted on 04/09/2002 2:01:53 PM PDT by madison46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
KEY SENATORS WHO NEED TO BE CALLED ON ANWR DRILLING

Washington D.C. area code (202):

Sen. Bayh (D-IN)............224-5623
Sen. Carnahan (D-MO)........224-6154
Sen. Carper (D-DE)..........224-2441
Sen. Cleland (D-GA).........224-3521
Sen. Conrad (D-ND)..........224-2043
Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH).....224-2315
Sen. Fitzgerald (R-IL)......224-2854
Sen. Hollings (D-SC)........224-6121
Sen. Johnson (D-SD).........224-5842
Sen. Lincoln (D-AR).........224-4843
Sen. McCain (R-AZ)..........224-2235
Sen. Nelson (D-NE)..........224-6551
Sen. Nelson (D-FL)..........224-5274
Sen. Smith (R-OR)...........224-3753
Sen. Specter (R-PA).........224-4254 

THANK YOU VERY MUCH..... 


5 posted on 04/09/2002 2:03:25 PM PDT by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
I guess Bush needs to be the whipping boy all over the world. I guess it does'nt occur to the man that we are buying them some time.
6 posted on 04/09/2002 2:03:48 PM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Bush's call for Israeli withdrawal is so very wrong. I voted for him, and he's embarrassing my vote by acting like a wuss.
7 posted on 04/09/2002 2:03:51 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
This truly is left wing bashing Bush but this thing is going to get worse before it gets better. If we (U.S.) keep demanding that Israel withdraw their troops and innocent civilians as well as troops keep getting killed, our friendship with Israel could sour very quickly. God help us!
8 posted on 04/09/2002 2:03:58 PM PDT by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
I do not believe a word of this British Arab-loving Reuters report. Ari Dan, Dori Gold, Newsweek and Israeli websites have well documented what a farce this faux criticism by Bush of Israel is. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are squarely oppsed to restraining Sharon. Powell and Rice got a reluctant Bush to agree to the SoS visit. An admin. "aide" (read Mary Matalin) told Newsweek that the "hardliners" see nothing wrong with Powell wasting his time while they prep for the war on Iraq. My friends in D.C. have told me aides have told them that Israel would be given "carte blanche" once our boys were on the ground in Iraq.
10 posted on 04/09/2002 2:06:56 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
I was just thinking that it must be a weird feeling for Bush, dealing with someone more stubborn and blunt than he is. Clearly, both men are acting in what each deems his own country's best intrests and can't back down. In the end, though, Bush can afford to lose face in the Arab world - its not like he's going to get a coalition to attack Iraq again anymore anyway. Sharon can't lose face without risking a fall from power.
16 posted on 04/09/2002 2:11:19 PM PDT by modern_orthodox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Aw c'mon....

"Give war a chance"!

27 posted on 04/09/2002 2:26:21 PM PDT by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001;LarryLied
ELON MOREH, West Bank, April 9 (Reuters) - Members of an Israeli tank brigade waging an offensive in the West Bank found a unique way to show how they felt about the U.S. president -- they adopted a stray dog and named it "George W. Bush". "He's a cowboy," one soldier said as the brown pit-bull terrier prowled an Israeli hilltop encampment overlooking the city of Nablus. "He barks a lot," said a second. "But he's useless," another chimed in.

What despicable ingrates!!!!!
U.S. Aid To Israel

A Conservative Total for U.S. Aid to Israel: $91 Billion-and Counting, by Shirl McArthur, Jan/Feb 2001

43 posted on 04/09/2002 3:04:33 PM PDT by luvzhottea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
I want Elijah's God to lead this battle, for he knew just what to do with the evil prophets of Ba`al. 1 Kings 18:40": And Elijah said unto them, Take the prophets of Baal; let not one of them escape. And they took them: and Elijah brought them down to the brook Kishon, and slew them there.

Sometimes, the evil is so great that there is no reason for it to continue any longer.

90 posted on 04/09/2002 4:59:36 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
The Israeli soldiers really know what Bush is---Worthless. That statement hit the nail on the head. Bush is also becoming the target of ire from million of Americans because of his double talk about getting rid of terrorism. He thinks he has the right but the Israeli's do not have the right to fight terrorism.
96 posted on 04/09/2002 5:11:40 PM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
If Gore had been elected, what would the dog have been called then?
100 posted on 04/09/2002 5:29:48 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Since the Jewish state can ill-afford to alienate it's chief ally and provider of $3 billion in annual aid...

Bottomline. Period.

As for the malcontents in Israel AND the instigating brats in Egypt for whom even $3,000,000,000 apiece yearly can't help keep the peace, why continue as it were? It's not as though these are the 51st and 52nd States of the Union -- OR ARE THEY?

103 posted on 04/09/2002 5:52:53 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Now is the time for trying to salvage the Bush Doctrine on terrorism, which is self-destructing with each passing hour. Here's the type of feedback methinks President Bush, Vice President Cheney and all the top Congressional leaders should be hearing before Secretary Powell pulls a Chamberlin on us:

Secretary Powell in the Court of Arafat: Resurrection or Last Rites for a World-Class Terrorist?

The wobbly Bush Doctrine on Terrorism appears to be imploding into foreign policy incoherence.

Today we hear that Secretary Powell will answer Arafat's summons to appear before that mass murdering soul brother and co-religionist of Osama bin Laden.

This can go only two ways: Secretary Powell either (1) delivers terrorist Arafat his last rites or (2) guarantees his resurrection. There is no middle term.

It is not too late to salvage the Bush Doctrine of non-appeasement, which right now is looking very Chamberlinesque.

We must stand by Israel as it purges the terrorists in its midst. Otherwise, forget United States homeland security.

108 posted on 04/09/2002 6:15:52 PM PDT by Hibernius Druid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RCW2001
Does anyone here believe for one second that George W. Bush and Sharon didn't plan out exactly what's going on right now. The U.S. and Israel are in constant contact and what is going on is POLITICS, pure and simple. If George W. Bush was to go in front of the world and publicly give Israel a green light, the entire middle east would be up in smoke right now.

President Bush is trying to keep a coalition together and nothing else. WWIII is not what he's looking for, and by demanding that Israel pull back and making the statement "Without Delay" is just politics. If president Bush says "Today we are cutting ties with Israel"... then it's serious. Until then he's just buying the Israeli's time without losing the coalition we currently have.

All the Bush bashers here on FR have been calling for Bush to spend some of his political capital, and now that he is spending that political capital so that Israel can go after the Palestinian terrorist, nobody can see what's going on here. After this deal is over in the west bank, does anyone think our relationship with Israel will be damaged in any way? GET A GRIP FREEPERS, WE WILL ALWAYS SUPPORT ISRAEL

110 posted on 04/09/2002 6:30:02 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson