Posted on 04/01/2002 11:57:11 PM PST by JohnHuang2
And your comments (post #29) hit the nail on the head!
bump!
I think there needs to be something dramatic done", Sen. Joseph Biden
Come clean Joseph. Did you really think it yourself, or did you steal it from someone?
bump!
I think there needs to be something dramatic done", Sen. Joseph Biden
Come clean Joseph. Did you really think it yourself, or did you steal it from someone?
bump!
...and he has ALWAYS been a terrorist, deserving such treatment as a terrorist deserves. For the administration not to outright label him as one, especially in the face of these actions gives license for him to continue to act as one.
Many people state that if Araskank goes, there will be no one to negotiate with. I'd suggest that the Palestinians would find someone rather than face annihilation. Others state that if we don't support Ara"rat" that the Muslim nations will unite against us in the diplomatic arena. I mean, what could happen? Do they they that Kuwait and Iraq might open diplomatic relations again? Do they think that Saudi Arabia might finance and export militant Islamism to other countries? Do they think that some group of terrorist might launch a terrorist attack on American soil? (Huh? All this already happened? Oh....)
I don't see what there is to lose by taking out Arascab.
The longer he holds out the more liberal scum will come to his defence.
Time for the teargas.
Rumsfeld: Norwegian Pilots Needed to Protect U.S.; Military 'Run Down' by Clinton
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.