Why is it so wrong for these top officers, responsible for the lives of so many to tell the truth as they see it to Congress? Has the administration finally gone around the bend in its attempt to stifle any honest examination of their conduct? What do y'all think?
1 posted on
03/29/2002 10:27:59 AM PST by
Pancho13
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Pancho13
I think I would avoid pissing off Rummy.
2 posted on
03/29/2002 10:31:31 AM PST by
wardaddy
To: Pancho13
I think loose lips sink ships and an officer in the military should FREAKING know better. Also I think there is a chain of command and military officers should honor that. Also I think there are people in this world that are consistently pessimistic. In my business I come across lots of people who say "Thats impossible, we can't do that." Then -- amazingly we do it.
3 posted on
03/29/2002 10:32:18 AM PST by
Naspino
To: Pancho13
Top officers clear stuff with their superior before shooting off at the lip...if that is a burden they cannot stand they can become civilians.
4 posted on
03/29/2002 10:33:04 AM PST by
DSHambone
To: Pancho13
The higher up the brass, the less they know about what is really going on. Political appointees included.
5 posted on
03/29/2002 10:33:04 AM PST by
Iris7
To: Pancho13
Because you don't GIVE AWAY TATICAL INFORMATION! Not how many people we have there, how many tanks, planes or bullets. You don't let the bad guys know this publically!. This could have been put out in some type of security briefing in private without TELLING THE BAD GUYS what OUR STATUS IS!
To: Pancho13
Mary Jo paging Mary Jo!
7 posted on
03/29/2002 10:34:28 AM PST by
sissyjane
To: Pancho13
Well I don't know if we ought to be broadcasting shortages, real or imagined. I was surprised Rummy dressed them down in public but he was asked about it and Rummy always answers if it isn't about secret stuff.
8 posted on
03/29/2002 10:34:36 AM PST by
cajungirl
To: Pancho13
The government hides behind lies. If people start telling the truth what would happen to the government?
9 posted on
03/29/2002 10:34:41 AM PST by
dljordan
To: Pancho13
"we are busier than we have ever been." The U.S. Army has had some busy moments over the past 200+ years.
To: Pancho13
Because one does NOT broadcast information like this to the enemy, that's why.
Also, re US troops needing rest: I'm closer to the troops than Kernan is, and they're saying "LET'S ROLL," not "let's rest."
11 posted on
03/29/2002 10:36:00 AM PST by
Poohbah
To: Pancho13
In war time, you do not say publicly "we are tired, and we are running out of bullets." When the generals have concerns the appropriate channel of communication does not include C-span.
To: Pancho13
Retired Rear Adm. Eugene Carroll Is this the guy who is always critical of the US military and used to have that show "America's Defense Monitor," or am I confusing him with someone else?
To: All
To: Pancho13
I think we are in a war. Would American Generals have said such during World War II to the Nazi's????
I would like to find out if these guys - Army Gen. William Kernan and Adm. Robert Natter - were appointed by Clintonistas......just curious.
Interesting that when Clinton had our people spread out over the entire world, never one word from the press or the Demoncreeps in Congress about our service men and women being tired or overtaxed or spread out too thin.....but plenty of conservative critics said so.
To: All
Please take a moment and Thank a Service Man or Woman.Just Click on the logo to send an e-mail.
To: Pancho13
There is a time and place for things. That information, if true, should have been relayed in private, perhaps a closed session of the committee. Seems to me the last thing in the world you want to do in the middle of a war is tell the enemy "this is a good time to attack us, we are tired and low on ammo...."
21 posted on
03/29/2002 10:44:43 AM PST by
Aquilla
To: Pancho13
I think a memo (or direct request) TO Rummy saying........"We need more of the J-Dam bombs in order to more efficiently help these poor rag-headed SOBs achieve their 72 virgin allotment", would illicit quick results. I'm sure Rummy would comply.
To: Pancho13
Rumsfeld said the 1.4 million men and women on active duty don't "begin to fit that characterization."
BS The Clinton military is coming home to roost
27 posted on
03/29/2002 10:48:30 AM PST by
uncbob
To: Pancho13
Has the administration finally gone around the bend in its attempt to stifle any honest examination of their conduct?Only an idiot would want the military to air its strengths and weaknesses in public.
To: Pancho13
Why is it so wrong for these top officers, responsible for the lives of so many to tell the truth as they see it to Congress? What a question.The Bloody Liberals Intentionally Asked an innocent leading question,which forced a truthful answer out of them,cause they made them feel "Comfortable"(cause when you're that high up you can't really lie/mis-lead,like my socialist co-workers do)Ironically enough, this is exactly what the "Hell-O-Crats" WANTED KNOWN around the world,they got Military personnel to get themselves in trouble,and THEY walk away unscathed.And people wonder why we don't need Tom Ridge appearing before any committees...How the "Hell-O-Crats" live w/ themselves on a daily basis, is beyond my comprehension.....
32 posted on
03/29/2002 10:51:13 AM PST by
Pagey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson