Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church Sex Probe Could Spell Trouble for Clinton
NEWSMAX ^ | 3/29/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 03/29/2002 6:03:47 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

A bombshell development in the priest sex-abuse scandal currently rocking the Catholic church raises troubling questions about why decades-old sexual assault allegations against ex-president Bill Clinton were never subjected to law enforcement scrutiny.

Detectives in Nassau County, New York are currently probing complaints against two priests going back 25 years, including allegations from one victim who contacted police long after the statute of limitations for the crime expired.

"We are going to conduct a thorough investigation before we come to some conclusion on the statute of limitation," Nassau Chief of Detectives Herbert Faust tells the New York Post in Friday editions.

"Who knows what will be revealed," he adds.

"Two of the victims, brothers Mark and Rainer Welzel, reportedly contacted the DA's office in 1998, but no action was taken because of the statute of limitation, which, in the case of minors, expires five years after a victim's 18th birthday," the paper said.

But with the Welzel case now reopened despite the expired statute of limitation, some wonder about the case of Arkansas businesswoman Juanita Broaddrick, who told NBC's "Dateline" in 1999 that she had been brutally raped twenty-one years earlier by then-Arkansas state attorney general Bill Clinton.

Though polls in the aftermath of the NBC broadcast showed most Americans found Broaddrick to be credible, state and local law enforcement officials, as well as Clinton impeachment prosecutors in Congress and the Office of Independent Counsel, declined to launch an official rape investigation because Arkansas' seven year statute of limitation for rape had long expired.

Likewise, news editors and reporters repeatedly invoked the expired statute of limitation to justify undercovering Broaddrick's charge. "NBC Nightly News" anchorman Tom Brokaw, for instance, refused to report his own network's bombshell Broaddrick exclusive.

But the ferocity with which ancient, often vague and unsubstantiated charges of sexual abuse against the Catholic church are now being pursued by both the news media and law enforcement has prompted questions about why similar charges leveled against powerful politicians like Clinton have been dismissed almost out of hand.

In the Nassau County case, Detective Chief Faust cited "the gravity of the allegations" to justify reopening the case deemed too old to be legally relevant just four years ago.

In the Clinton case, investigators for sexual harassment accuser Paula Jones told NewsMax.com that their files were bursting with accounts of sexual assault and forcible rape and sodomy.

"If you want a pattern of aggressive sexual behavior, we have that," said Beverly Lambert, of Accuracy Investigations.

If Arkansas police were to follow the example of their New York brethren and waive the statute of limitations for rape, chances for a conviction against the ex-president would be good, according to former sex crimes prosecutor Cynthia Alksne.

"One woman's word is enough to prosecute a rapist," Alksne told the Wall Street Journal in 1999. "Indeed, the law explicitly permits a jury to convict a rapist on the word of the victim alone if her testimony is deemed credible . ... At a minimum, Broaddrick was a credible accuser."

Like Detective Faust in the priest sex scandal, Alksne cited the gravity of the charge, saying, "If these allegations are true, jail is where Mr. Clinton belongs."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: churchsex; clinton; clintonhaters
"New York are currently probing complaints against two priests going back 25 years"
1 posted on 03/29/2002 6:03:47 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
NewsMax reminds me of Judicial Watch.
2 posted on 03/29/2002 6:11:19 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
The legacy redux:

"If these allegations are true, jail is where Mr. Clinton belongs."

Nudge nudge....wink wink....if you know what I mean....

3 posted on 03/29/2002 6:19:24 AM PST by spokeshave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I am patient, and I am certain that Bill Clinton is going to hell. I would rather not see Clinton go to jail if it meant that we would have government prosecutors operating around this nation without a statute of limitations. Although I had nothing but contempt for Clinton, I never feared him. The nameless, faceless government bureaucrats given even more power, I fear. After all who would have thought a so-called justice department would burn women and children at Waco for some asserted cause that no one seems to remember.
4 posted on 03/29/2002 6:21:57 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Church Sex Probe Could Spell Trouble for Clinton

Yeah right of course it will
5 posted on 03/29/2002 6:22:12 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
During the Clarence Thomas "high tech lynching" NOW put out bumper stickers "I believe Anita" about a decades old alleged event. Well, if you lib types still happen to have one, just mark in a "Ju" in front of "Anita"!
6 posted on 03/29/2002 6:23:28 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
I think this is NewsMax's signal to Judicial Watch to prepare to file yet another lawsuit. I predict we will receive Larry Klayman's email missive about it very soon. Once again, it will be much ado about, in the end, nothing.
7 posted on 03/29/2002 6:26:45 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
"Although I have nothing but contempt for Clinton, I never feared him". That's because you never knew him, and so he had nothing to fear from you. That's how so many people went dead or missing.
8 posted on 03/29/2002 6:31:05 AM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
raises troubling questions about why decades-old sexual assault allegations against ex-president Bill Clinton were never subjected to law enforcement scrutiny.

Heck, the most important question is, why are all the Kennedys still running free? They should have kicked ole Joe Kennedy's arse out of the church back in the 30s, and thrown him in jail for illegal booze running. The church should have disclipined him for adultery and other things, but turned a blind eye. Law enforcement is not for liberal Democrats nor is church discipline for wealthy Catholics, I guess.

Bill Clinton? Har Har Har. He'll live and prosper and see us all to our graves before he gets his.

9 posted on 03/29/2002 6:32:26 AM PST by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If Arkansas police were to follow the example of their New York brethren and waive the statute of limitations for rape, chances for a conviction against the ex-president would be good

Dear Limbacher,

He's gone. I know, I know. Millions are just as infuriated that he skated as you are. He'll get his. Just let it go....

10 posted on 03/29/2002 6:33:31 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Well, no sh-t Sherlock! Get with the times. X42 and her spouse are # 1 crooks and traitors, we all know it. Now, forget it, forget it forget it. Don't count. Mooove on. Drop badge off, move on.
11 posted on 03/29/2002 6:33:59 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Wishful thinking. Clinton is too well connected. The law can't touch him.
12 posted on 03/29/2002 6:37:38 AM PST by The Scorpion King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Blabity blabity blabity blabity...

I guess these guys don't have anything else to do during Holy Week.

13 posted on 03/29/2002 6:40:28 AM PST by Vladiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
again, it will be much ado about, in the end, nothing.---- you can say that sister!
14 posted on 03/29/2002 6:46:35 AM PST by longfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
Why is everyone focused on Clinton and not the church?
15 posted on 03/29/2002 7:24:34 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: clinton haters
indexing
16 posted on 03/29/2002 7:33:05 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why is everyone focused on Clinton and not the church?
Because what's been going on in the Church is already out in the open?? Because the situation is being dealt with?? Because, apparently, Bill won't get his until Judgement Day-- so what's the point???
17 posted on 03/29/2002 7:38:03 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson