Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davidjquackenbush
Regarding your 177; I do not need any of your condescension. And as to this:

What did you expect him to say about slavery in a race for the Illinois legislature, at age 24, given that Illinois was a free state? That's like looking for comments on our relationship with China in a campaign speech for the city council.

...my point was that I didn't understand why the internal search on that website even pulled that speech as a result given the parameters I had set. Now do you understand?

217 posted on 03/29/2002 12:42:24 PM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: one2many
What I "understand" is that you will talk about anything except the question I ask about DiLorenzo's interpretation of specific texts.

And that you have eagerly adopted his recourse to the yelp of "ad hominem" rather than do so.

So why don't you take one more diversionary pot shot at me and then we'll let the matter rest.

Of, if you prefer, please tell me if you think that Lincoln's words on the Bank decision in the Dred Scott speech reveal a focus on economic policy, or slavery.

239 posted on 03/29/2002 4:53:29 PM PST by davidjquackenbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson