Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
It's censorship, but I have to wonder what kind of person looks at porn in the library.
3 posted on 03/25/2002 9:21:59 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
It's censorship, but I have to wonder what kind of person looks at porn in the library.

To increase library attendance but up banners ALL NUDE XXX NOTHING LEFT OUT, PRIVATE BOOTHS.

24 posted on 03/25/2002 9:35:26 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
"What kind of person looks at porn in the library?"

Here, "homeless" men hang out in the library downtown and surf the porn sites in front of other patrons during the time they must be out of the shelters and they're not drinking/drugging. One recently assaulted a patron.

Of course, the libs claim it's their constitutional right to do all of the above. Meanwhile, lots of taxpaying citizens just won't go there.

28 posted on 03/25/2002 9:39:21 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
One's that don't have a cable modem at home. :)
60 posted on 03/25/2002 11:24:50 AM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone;Dimensio;Salman
I work in a library that provides public Internet access.

When we first installed the computers, we assumed that they'd mostly be used by students, genealogists, people doing medical research, that sort of thing. What we got instead were creepy middle-aged men who'd sit and stare at the screen for hours. Once we learned how to check the browser histories, we found out why. They were accessing every kind of porn you could imagine. And this was in our reference room, with kids doing homework ten feet away.

Luckily, our board of trustees approved filtering as soon as we told them what was happening. Within two weeks of installing the filtering software, most of the perverts had lost interest and vanished. Only one person hung around complaining about "censorship"; he was recently arrested for posession of child pornography.

Now when students come in, there are actually computers available for them. The computers are being used for education and research, the things they were intended for when the library bought them.

The ALA loves to wring their hands and say "Oh, but filters are imperfect! They block access to legitimate information!" Sure, if you buy a cheap piece of software, you're going to get what you pay for. (I actually know of librarian at a nearby library who purposely bought the worst filter she could find, so as not to "censor any more than she had too.") But there are execellent, highly configurable filters on the market. I know, we have one.

I agree that parents should take responsibility for supervising their children. But the fact is that most of them don't. Parents assume that the library is a safe place and use it as free day care. I've seen kids so young they need help going to the bathroom dumped at the library for an hour or more while mommy goes grocery shopping. That kind of parent doesn't think twice about leaving a 12-year-old alone at a public computer for several hours. If we insist that kids under a certain age must have a parent supervising them, the parents look at us like we're from Mars.

61 posted on 03/25/2002 11:34:43 AM PST by Judy Bolton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson