Skip to comments.
Money also matters [How CA's landmark law to reduce class size was a disaster for poor students]
Salon ^
| Feb 20, 2002
| Anthony York
Posted on 03/24/2002 3:02:05 PM PST by summer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: IncredibleHulk
You're absolutely right that the richest neighborhoods in CA don't get most of the money. I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in CA, and our local public school gets less money than most other school districts, because of the way the $ are allocated. And because of Gray Davis' budget shortages, that won't change.
Vote for Simon.
To: JoeFromCA
I have taught in classes with more than 35 students, and as few as 15. Smaller classes are better. But, I do not agree with you that everything else should be tossed out the window in favor of small classes, nor do I think smaller classes work to the benefit of poor students if they have a bad teacher. So, while your experience has been good, and though I certainly do prefer a smaller classes for a multitude of reasons, there are additional considerations.
22
posted on
03/24/2002 6:27:39 PM PST
by
summer
To: summer
Tell me what parts are inaccurate. The parts of the article you quoted are the same for all school districts, rich or poor, except for the part about new facilities. New facilities are generally more expensive in more expensive areas due to property values so here again, poor schools have an advantage. They just simple can't utilize their advantages because there is never enough for the freeloaders. Put up a fence, throw the food and textbooks over the fence and give a graduation exam once a year. Those that pass get out.
To: IncredibleHulk
Put up a fence, throw the food and textbooks over the fence and give a graduation exam once a year. Those that pass get out.
This part is inaccurate. They don't need your permission to get out. They will leave long before that.
24
posted on
03/24/2002 7:22:32 PM PST
by
summer
To: IncredibleHulk
The real problem with poor schools is that they spend much more money on repair/replacement
of vandalized and stolen property, police patrols on campus, expensive but useless
teachers because they're the only ones willing to go in there and that's the only
jobs they can get and administrators that are on their way to a good job.
From my five years in CA (West Los Angeles), I'd say you've summed up the situation
pretty well.
And I learned a bit from having passed the tests for the program that LAUSD has
to take non-credentialed persons onboard and let them teach and make up requirements
over two years to get credentialed.
(I decided to not go forward...I'm just not left enough to go with the LAUSD culture.)
I got some "observations hours" at a good high school on the west side of Los Angeles.
The teacher in the class told me that the "poorer" schools often have MUCH better
equipment say for chemistry classes because the funding scheme actually favors
"poorer" schools.
Now, I don't know all the financial details...but that's what an LAUSD teacher told me.
25
posted on
03/24/2002 7:33:16 PM PST
by
VOA
To: summer
To: summer
bump for future read.
27
posted on
10/04/2002 8:29:46 AM PDT
by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson