Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
On what basis could Dr. Emerson be acquitted on the remand, since the Fifth Circuit struck down Judge Cumming's ruling that 18 U.S.C., § 922(g)(h) is unconstitutional?

On a theoretical level, he can be acquitted simply because he hasn't been tried yet, which is all the reason the SCOTUS needs to duck the case. On a practical level, the only basis on which he can be acquitted would seem to be jury nullification, because the 5th Circuit has basically made the only issue for trial whether or not he possessed a gun after being served with a restraining order, which isn't (AFAIK) seriously in dispute.

44 posted on 04/02/2002 1:41:44 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
On a practical level, the only basis on which he can be acquitted would seem to be jury nullification....

LOL, I love it, LL! Jury nullification! Juries ought to nullify more often, IMHO. If judges won't respect the Constitution, why, juries still can. And their verdict cannot be questioned. Vox populi at its very best. :^) Thanks for sharing your thoughts with me, LL. All my best -- bb.

46 posted on 04/03/2002 5:25:59 AM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson