Replies

well, if they can get it to just a psychiatric 'disease' then maybe in 15 to 20 years there could be a movement to make it just an 'alternate lifestyle' -- just as homosexuality was a psychiatric disorder until the early 70s.

That is already underway: to have pedophilia accepted as just another lifestyle, another sexual choice. "Intergen," (short for "intergenerational") as homosexual pushers call it, is their next frontier, and it is today where homosexuality was twenty or thirty years ago.

Here's what they're doing to lay the groundwork:

Reduce and eventually eliminate "age of consent" laws. These laws are under legal challenge in all 50 states. This will remove legal restrictions to child rape.

Homosexual "rights" laws: these laws typically include verbiage that will CLEARLY be interpreted by courts in coming years as PROHIBITING any laws prohibiting sex with children. (Now you know one more reason to oppose these ludicrous pieces of legislation.) In fact. courts will certainly interpret, based upon "hate speech" laws, opposition to pedophilia to be "hate speech" and "hate crime."

The APA and other groups (now, Johns Hopkins) are pushing---under relentless, tectonic pressure from homosexual groups who can leverage government, foundations, grants, etc.---to normalize pedophilia and to marginalize and eventually criminalize opposition to pedophilia.

Homosexuals are using their celebrity wherever possible (Rosie O'Dyke in Florida for example) to facilitate another avenue they discovered in the last decade or two: grow your own. To gain access to children, grow them from test tubes, adopt them, foster them (e.g., Poundstone, Michael Jackson, et al.)

Twenty or thirty years ago, would you have believed that in our public schools children would be shown videos of anal male sex, while at the same time the "Ten Commandments" would be removed and banned and children wearing shirts with patriotic slogans would be sent home and their parents prosecuted? No? It's difficult to believe now that in thirty years homos will look back upon Rosie and Poundstone as those who helped "free" homosexuals.

Remember, as we heard a gazillion times during the Clinton scandals: the government has no right in your bedroom, correct? What you do in your bedroom is up to you. Ken Starr was snooping around Clinton's bedroom. We don't need anyone telling us what to do in our bedroom.

Fast forward.

Homosexuals say that as well. When the age of consent laws are removed, then what they do with an abducted or an adopted child in their bedroom will be no one's business, and they will say, legally and with legal legitimacy, the government has no right to be in their bedroom, get the government out of our bedroom, yadayada.

And if you opposed them, you are homophobic, and you "HATE." And if you try to stop them, or prosecute or persecute them, then you are doing to them what was done to Matthew Sheppard. These people going after children are living their lives just like Matthew Sheppard was. All the homilies we have heard in recent weeks about Sheppard (what has it been---an anniversary or something? I forgot to celebrate one less of them. Dang!)---"Matthew Sheppard was just living his life, and because he was homosexual he was killed. Homosexuals must be free to be homosexuals and not have any laws made against them just because they are homosexuals.

So Michael Jackson was just living his life with those little boys on never land ranch. And on and on. Homosexual Rights laws state that the government can make NO law about a person's sexual preference. If one's preference is children....do the math. It's coming.

The 'psychiatric problem' of the Church isn't anything but HOMOSEXUALITY. The press hasn't got the guts to call that a disease,perversion, abnormality so they misname the problem to pedaphilia. If the Church hadn't ordained homosexuals, they wouldn't have a problem. Celebacy is just a red herring. . . The liberals choose to think a celebate life is 'unnatural' but nuns and priests have been living it, as have young people up until they were told it wasn't necessary after the 'pill' 30 years ago, for millenia! As someone who found no problem in remaining virginal until being married in my late 20's despite a very active dating life, one more time, the liberals are full of it! Remaining celebate until I found real love is the best decision I ever made. Once married, using an IUD, a la advice from the community rather than my Church, was the worst decision I ever made. As a result of that, I remain childless. Had I followed the Church's advice completely, and not used forbidden birth control methods, my life would have been very different. The mistake the Church made was to try to appease the liberals in the 60's and ordaining homosexuals. It'll be interesting to see whether the mainstream press every admits it!