[Reagan Man]

So if one side wants the abolition of the Bill of Rights, and the other side doesn't, it becomes "pragmatic" politics to concede the overturning of one amendment every few years, in the interest of "compromise"?
I see.

You see what you want to see. Your analogy is ridiculous.

I see, you're politically naive too.

Jeers.

[Lazamataz]

You see what you want to see. Your analogy is ridiculous.

It is not at all ridiculous. Compromising is losing us ground, and that is what my allegorical illustration is meant to illustrate.

Your blind fealty to a party or a man is reminiscient of the 'useful idiots' that got communism and fascism established in many countries.