[John Robinson]

Jim's first complaint was the purple,lavendar color. It's actually not purple though, more of a gray-blue. Technically speaking, its RGB model has an equal amount of red and green component and a bit more blue component. I *BELIEVE* it would technically be purple only if it had more red than green. But I am certainly no color-theory expert.

Anyway. We couldn't find a more suitable color that did not blast our eyes. The old blue is too bright. We'll gladly review alternatives -- just save the web page as HTML and replace the "lavendar" (HTML color #777799) with something better, then mail your new page to john@robinson-defehr.com

[MozartLover]

I like the colors. Easy on the eyes.

However I agree with the concerns about the "My Comments" page..........a space in between each comment would be wonderful..........it's a little hard to read...especially for those of us in the "bifocal years.":)

[Spunky]

We couldn't find a more suitable color that did not blast our eyes.

But something that blasts our eyes
IS AN EYE CATCHER
;-)

test

[PrivateIdaho]

I think the blue/grey color is good, subtle and easy on the eyes.

However, I don't like the blue font for the Article titles, I hope that's just temporary for the beta. Why not stick with default browser settings for read/unread links? The link colors should be a user preference. (IMHO)

[Dominic Harr]

I like the look and feel. Very nice.

It suits well.

Altho I would like to repeat what someone else said about the 'My Comments' title reverting to 'Self-Search'.

Altho that's a very minor detail.