[B4Ranch]

The UN is building its own army to enforce its will. In 1992, UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, fulfilling a directive from the UN Security Council, unveiled An Agenda for Peace, a plan to strengthen UN "peacekeeping" capabilities. The plan calls for armed forces to be made available to the UN "on a permanent basis." It ominously warns, "The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed" and proceeds to name a long list of "risks for stability" that would be used to justify use of the "permanent" UN army to enforce its will. Incredibly, U.S. leaders are using America's military to pave the way for this UN army. In Bosnia, Somalia, Haiti, and elsewhere, foreign UN commanders have controlled our troops. When 15 Americans were killed over Iraq in mid-1994, Vice-President Gore extended condolences "to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations." Even more incredibly, it has been the official policy of the U.S. government since 1961 to disarm America and create a UN army. This policy concludes: "progressive controlled disarmament would proceed to the point where no nation would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force." (See State Department publication 7277: Freedom From War.)

[Don Myers]

Well, the UN already has NATO.

[DoughtyOne]

I hear you bud, but if you can get more than ten people intelligent enough to know the implications of what you have related, my hats off to you. Even on this forum the lights are out when it comes to this subject.

[PRND21]

Bump

[PRND21]

The UN is, to me, a much greater threat than work-seeking immigrants from down South.
Where's the outrage? Good to see a little after a week of Mexican fear mongering.

[Iowa Granny]

Free Vulcan, if you think Ed Fallon is nutz, wait until you read this.

Thanks for the bump, B4. I may be able to take some time to delve into this over the summer months. If you see additional thread on this subject, I'd appreciate your bumping me.