Replies

With all due respect, the author's math appears to be valid for every conceiveable real or theoretical situation in which data sequences itself without intelligent aid. - Southack

"Do you mean through chemical reactions, or randomly? One of these things is not like the other..." - ThinkPlease

You are sadly missing the point. It's not that chemical reactions are "random" or not, it's how chemical reactions sequence data that matters.

The author's math effectively covers the sequencing of data, be it via magnetism on your hard drive, chemical reactions forming DNA strands, monkeys pounding letters to quote Shakespeare by accident, et al.

You are sadly missing the point. It's not that chemical reactions are "random" or not, it's how chemical reactions sequence data that matters.

And you are also missing the point. I asked you earlier to show me a published work that showed us that DNA is formed in the manner that Watson says it does. You've had a month....any luck? None of the works that you showed me at that time did so, and I've been very patient. Please put up, my patience is running out.