Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nebullis
"DOS and Windows XP are both binary (unlike genetics). Anyone who knows anything about software can easily see a pathway, in fact, multiple pathways between the two."

DOS and Windows XP can both be considered as messages.

Anyone familiar with cryptography can tell you that to extract one message from another requires a Key and an Algorithm (which could be as simple as a bitflip, but more than likely would be much more complex).

The math in this thread effectively covers the mathematical probability/improbability of such a Key self-forming on its own at random (i.e. without intelligent intervention).

Essentially (though the actual number can vary slightly based upon definitions/pre-conditions used), the Key would have to be less than 96 bytes long for even a remote chance at forming "naturally."

Can you show a 96 byte Key that can extract the Windows XP "message" from DOS?

Not on your life.

557 posted on 04/04/2002 10:52:55 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]


To: Southack, John Locke
DOS and Windows XP can both be considered as messages.

Except that in evolution, noise can be information. Some of the information is contained in the structure and attributes of molecules themselves. (In some ways, life is a property of matter.)

Again, using an imprecise model for life and then imposing the limitations of that model on life is not valid.

559 posted on 04/04/2002 12:08:11 PM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: Nebullis
Now that we've filtered through some of the initial flotsam, I believe that it's time that you address Post #557.
593 posted on 04/05/2002 5:58:44 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: Nebullis
Now that we've filtered through some of the initial flotsam, distractions, red herrings, straw men, and sophomoric logical errors, I believe that it's time that you truthfully address Post #557.
623 posted on 04/07/2002 10:41:50 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: Nebullis
Now that we've filtered through some of the initial flotsam, distractions, red herrings, straw men, and sophomoric logical errors, I believe that it's time that you truthfully address Post #557.
655 posted on 04/08/2002 5:03:54 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

To: John Robinson
The math in this thread effectively covers the mathematical probability/improbability of such a Key self-forming on its own at random (i.e. without intelligent intervention).

Hey ... "intelligent intervention" ... that must be you!

667 posted on 04/08/2002 6:48:40 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson