The math in this thread demonstrates that some events will not naturally occur.
Ergo, there must be another answer...
No, all that Watson has demonstrated was that you can use randomness where it is not applicable to get unreasonable answers. Neither you nor he have been able to adequately describe how his results have any physical significance. His logic isn't all that good either, since he leaves himself quite wide open to several logical holes, as Physicist mentions in this very thread. Seems to me you should find something more airtight to hang your hat on.