Posted on 02/25/2002 7:35:42 AM PST by FresnoDA
Murder charge likely in missing-girl investigation
|
![]() |
By J. Harry Jones February 25, 2002 It is increasingly likely that a murder charge will be sought against David Westerfield possibly as early as today for the death of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam, even though her body has not been found. A law enforcement source close to the investigation told The San Diego Union-Tribune that "investigators and prosecutors are of the belief she is dead." The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the murder charge would include special allegations that could lead to the death penalty if Westerfield is convicted.
San Diego police Chief David Bejarano would not comment specifically on the source's claim, but said a decision on whether to bring a murder charge would be made today. "We have been working with the investigators, the District Attorney's Office and the family throughout the weekend," Bejarano said. "Even if we do file the charges, there is always still the hope that she will be found." Westerfield, who turns 50 today, is being held in isolation in the downtown jail without bail on charges of kidnapping and burglary in connection with the disappearance of Danielle from her Sabre Springs home. Danielle last was seen Feb. 1, when her father put her to bed, police say. Westerfield, who lives two houses from the van Dams, is scheduled to be arraigned tomorrow. He was arrested Friday, following a three-week investigation. Authorities said DNA tests found Danielle's blood in Westerfield's motor home and on a piece of his clothing. Additional evidence was discovered on a piece of the girl's clothing in her bedroom. One reason for bringing the murder charge now is to avoid a possible legal entanglement, a source said. Theoretically, if Westerfield were to plead guilty immediately to the kidnapping and burglary charges, his attorney might be able to argue double jeopardy if a murder charge were brought later. The decision to charge Westerfield with murder was discussed over the weekend with Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, the source said. A spokeswoman for the van Dams last night said the couple would not comment on the case until after Westerfield's arraignment. Westerfield became the main suspect within days of the girl's disappearance when he consented to, and failed, a polygraph test, several sources have said. His Mountain Pass Road home had been under constant surveillance by detectives and members of the media covering what has become a national story. He was arrested at his attorney's office Friday. Bejarano said during a news conference Friday that police "believe without question that DNA evidence links Mr. Westerfield to Danielle's disappearance." Tests on additional pieces of biological evidence are pending. Police started looking at Westerfield because he was the only neighbor away from home the weekend Danielle disappeared. He told police he socialized with Brenda van Dam and two of her friends the evening of Feb. 1 at a Poway bar. He said he went home alone, then drove his motor home to the desert, where he spent the weekend by himself. Authorities and hundreds of volunteers have searched eastern San Diego County methodically, hoping to find some trace of the girl. Yesterday, 200 volunteers hiked through the Kitchen Creek area of the Cleveland National Forest, which is dissected by Interstate 8 the freeway Westerfield likely would have driven to the desert. Prosecuting a murder case without a body is difficult, but not impossible. Last year, a former Santee man was convicted of killing his estranged wife, Guadalupe Dailey, even though her body never has been found. |
If they found blood in large enough quantities, that could be enough to convince me that she's dead, at least. I've seen several different cases on the "New Detectives" (Discovery Channel) where blood was found (thanks to good old Luminol) in large enough quantities that experts were convinced that no one could have survived losing that much blood.
If I were a juror, and the evidence shows he was in her bedroom, and there were large quantities of blood found in his camper, it wouldn't take much for me to convict him of murder, without a body. The threshold is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Barring a house fire, a middle-aged neighbor breaking into a 7-year old girl's bedroom is up to no good. No reasonable person would argue with that.
I SOO Agree! In fact, when we heard of the disappearance on the late night local news the day she was reported missing,
I turned to my husband and said: What the hell kind of parent isn't going to check on the kids if the DOOR IS OPEN and the ALARM IS BLINKING?
I believe he was convicted on the testimony of his own brother, who was on the boat and said that after the cooler floated, Capano shot it full of wholes to get it to sink, but it fell open and the brother saw a human foot going down into the water.
In an even stranger twist, they were able to match blood from Capano's house to Fahey's blood because she had donated blood a few days before her murder--they had to literally stop a ship heading to Europe with the plasma on board.
I came across what the patents were for, but can't find the information again. His patent inventions improve the quality of certain people's lives...sort of like a prosthetic.
He probably has more money than the high-rolling Van Dams ever thought they could have.
Westerfield is a self-employed Engineer who worked out of his home. He seemed to enjoy financial independence due to his inventions.
sw
IF the van Dams had sued Rick Roberts, you would have been in here screaming that they concern themselves more with their public image than with the life of their daughter.
You are to FR what the National Enquirer is to journalism.
Rick Roberts is a vermin as well. He can't be sued, because he simply hides behind the "Hey! Someone told me! I was just repeating what information I was given!" mediawhore argument.
Meanwhile, the few people that I AM sure have used Danielle van Dam, are you, and those scumbag discjockeys, if Westerfield is convicted, we can add his name to that list.
If you, or anyone else has PROOF of negligence by the van Dams turn it in to the police.
If you or anyone has the testimony OF ONE NEIGHBOR, OR ANYONE AT ALL corraborating the rumours that weird stuff (orgies) went on in that house, turn it in to the police.
If any one of you have any PROOF of any of this crap that you have been passing of as facts, turn it in to the police.
It's your moral duty, as it is that "highly placed law enforcement officer's" duty to investigate those allegations, and take action accordingly.
But the authorities have not, so I guess that by applying the same logic that you use, the allegations are false.
The van Dams just had a child kidnapped and murdered. They had a child stolen from the bed she sleeps in and murdered, that's the most horrifying thing that I can imagine happening to any parent, let alone to a little child.
You, and way too many other FReepers, have been having a blast with this.
It's been like watching vampires feed.
Disgusting.
Another fascinating piece of evidence is the fact that the police originally suspected the (at that time) Governor, Tom Carper. Fahey worked as his scheduling secretary and her diary was full of references to "T.C." and her affair with him. Carper was cleared of suspicion quickly, but it's interesting that the family and police leapt to that conclusion so quickly.
I, too, find it very strange that the Van Damms have not taken the opportunity to explicitly and vociferiously deny these accusations. Fact is, that even if you allow that the alleged behavior isn't criminal, it is certainly arguable that if it took place, the parent's conduct may have created a situation that put their children in the path of someone who meant them harm.
No one is suggesting that their grief isn't real, or that they in any way intended for this to happen, but can't you at least allow for the possibility that since they aren't denying the activity, they are in some way responsible? Aren't parents to be held accountable for their actions--particularly if these actions put others at risk?
http://www.crimelibrary.com/classics5/capano/3.htm
is the link to the cooler murder guy.
Seeyabye
BTW, I work with Brenda's younger brother.
Brenda and David were players, they did not deny it.
No one is saying Westerfield isn't guilty, I'll accept that... just saying that the VD's were not your average suburban couple that evening.
Brenda VD is a slut. Deal with it.
sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.