You mean less than 1%, right. Perhaps. But unprincipled liberals are wiser than conservatives like Lazz. They know we are in a war and stick together even if they don't agree with everything their candidate does. Disgusting? Of course, but they keep moving that ball down the field don't they? So, Lazz would let Hillary Clinton win rather than vote for Bush, right? Give me a break. Until conservatives get smarter and operate as a coalition the liberals will continue to plod along and cram their agenda down our throats.
All this emotion and no one knows what Bush will do. Let's hope Bush does the right thing and vetoes this stupid idiotic bill so we don't lose Lazz and others to whatever reincarnation of Buchanan emerges in 2004. Of course if it's not this vote, it will be something else I suppose that ticks them off. There's just no pleasing everyone.
I don't think Messr. Bush can afford 'less than 1%' of his voting base.
He won by 500 or so votes.
If he signs the bill, he loses my vote. Cause and effect.