It would be far more effective for Creationists to formulate an argument, consisting of hypotheses and evidence, with predictions. Perhaps that would take them out of websites, forums, school board meetings and politics, and into the research labs and journals. Until there is a real THEORY (in the scientific sense of the word) of ID or Creationism, with all the attributes that entails, the quotes are worthless because there is no science behind the argument. At most, the quotes might show that we are not omniscient. But omniscience is not a pre-requisite for education or science.
Einstein said "God does not play dice with the universe." The quote alone is not an argument against quantum mechanics, and despite Einstein's brilliance and recognized expertise in physics, he was still wrong. Quoting him over and over would not make him right. But this is the error medved makes everytime he posts his list.