Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Care to come over and tell us why the Russians won and that there's no scandal here? :-)
263 posted on 02/13/2002 10:13:44 AM PST by Chief Inspector Clouseau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Chief Inspector Clouseau
As an aside, is NBC Infobabe Kelli O'Donnell related to NBC Infobabe Nora O'Donnell? They've both got the red hair thing going. (Of course, they are Irish).
273 posted on 02/13/2002 10:15:17 AM PST by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: Chief Inspector Clouseau
1 - Like almost all judged sports the "scoring" system is base + difficulty - errors. Thus a harder routine performed not as well can still rate equal to or higher than an easier routine performed better. The Russians had the harder routine according to everybody.
2 - Like almost all judged sports 50% of the scoring is based on artistic merit. Since, as we all know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder half the score is up to the whims of the judges (IMHO the Canadians' costumes were hideous and anybody that bases anything on Love Story should be pelted with rocks and garbage, my score card gave them an artistic merit score of 0).
3 - Unlike most judged sports the scores don't actually matter (I'm talking strictly within the rules here). The scores are put forth to give the audience some indication of what the judges are thinking during the competition. The actual placement in the standings is done by vote, the judges vote 1 -2 -3 -who cares for each competitor and that's how the awards are determined.

In short this is just a fine shining example of why judged sports are to be mocked. There can be no objective determination of the winner in a judged sport. We see this over and over usually in figure skating, frequently in gymnastics and sometimes in diving. It always starts the same way, some butthead color commentator decides he's just seen a gold medal performance and says so on the air, then all of America agrees with him, but the judges weren't watching the TV broadcast and they didn't feel they saw a gold medal performance. And now there's some huge "controversy" that will burn hot for a while and then nobody will care until the next "scandal" and this one get's refered to in some retrospective of sporting scandals, like NBC aired about 9AM MST today (roughly an hour before the press conference).

310 posted on 02/13/2002 10:25:55 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson