Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I put this in the breaking news because I wanted to get as many comments as possible; I'm curious what everyone thinks/knows about this. For example, does anyone know if this means they're going to refer to God as "It", and not "He", in the new version?
1 posted on 01/28/2002 6:08:09 AM PST by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: FourtySeven
Sickening and not surprising
2 posted on 01/28/2002 6:09:12 AM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
I put this in the breaking news because I wanted to get as many comments as possible


Didn't realize that was the purpose of having a Breaking News category...
3 posted on 01/28/2002 6:11:38 AM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
LOL,.........more PAGAN philosophy junk!
4 posted on 01/28/2002 6:13:27 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
For example, does anyone know if this means they're going to refer to God as "It", and not "He", in the new version?

Also, terms referring to God and Jesus Christ have not been altered.

Doesn't look like it.

A. Cricket

5 posted on 01/28/2002 6:14:35 AM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Just wait till they get to work on the hymnals....er, I mean hernals....er, I mean itnals....oh, well....

Leni

6 posted on 01/28/2002 6:15:41 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
The NIV like everything else that is not KLV is taken from corrupted texts. I trust none of them except the King James Version.
7 posted on 01/28/2002 6:16:53 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Whatever....
8 posted on 01/28/2002 6:17:15 AM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Don't buy it.
9 posted on 01/28/2002 6:17:50 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven;khepera;*christian
Just more PC fanatics rewriting history and destroying the English language. Last I looked I was part of the HUMAN race, but I am now a part of the HUPERSON race? I think not. Rewriting the Bible is the last straw!!! A bunch of feminists radicals that hate MEN are responsible for this attrocity!!
10 posted on 01/28/2002 6:17:55 AM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
".....does anyone know if this means they're going to refer to God as "It", and not "He", in the new version?"

Not that I support or agree with altering the words in the Bible any at all.... but the article does say,"terms referring to God and Jesus Christ have not been altered. ". So hopefully at least we will be spared that awful possibility you spoke of.

11 posted on 01/28/2002 6:17:56 AM PST by Apple Pan Dowdy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Good thing that the Greek and Hebrew languages aren't "gender nuetral".
12 posted on 01/28/2002 6:18:22 AM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
I certainly hope that this is not the only necessary change they will make. For example, many of our wonderful friends of other faiths are offended by the frequent references to Christ, especially in the second half of the Bible. If this could also be changed, it would make the Bible much less offensive to many people. I think it is maore more important for today's Christians to be concerned with building and maintaining those elaborate buildings than it is alienating many fine folks who be helping us pay for them. Christianity needs to move much more than it has toward Unitarianism and follow the model of the Episcoplians. The Episcopalians were able to change a large but rigid group of believers into a very small group of leftists by being very flexible about dogma. The unisex Bible is a fine start but if we really want to run Christianity into the ground, let's also think about getting rid of Christ and many of the hard things that Christianity tries to make us do.
13 posted on 01/28/2002 6:18:56 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Folks who insist on gender-neutral are typically not big Bible buyers...
15 posted on 01/28/2002 6:19:33 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Throw away your NIV and certainly don't buy this garbage.
17 posted on 01/28/2002 6:21:44 AM PST by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
Yes, it matters. Here are some examples:

Mark 1:17
Gender-neutral NIrV: "... I will make you fishers of people."
Revised NIrV: "... I will make you fishers of men."

John 11:50
Gender-neutral NIrV: "It is better if one person dies for the people ..."
Revised NIrV: "It is better if one man dies ..."

Acts 1:21
Gender-neutral NIrV: "So we need to choose someone to take his place. It will have to be a person ..."
Revised NIrV: "... It will have to be a man ..."

18 posted on 01/28/2002 6:22:48 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
"Our Parent, Who are in heaven..."
21 posted on 01/28/2002 6:23:39 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
This sort of political correctness is awful......
25 posted on 01/28/2002 6:27:55 AM PST by Gopher Broke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven

26 posted on 01/28/2002 6:28:11 AM PST by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven
I'm not sure about this title. The International Bible Society (IBS) is a conservative lot.

I think what they've done is take the really glaring examples that can clearly be translated as neutral and are rendering them that way. For example, anthropoi is the plural of anthropos in Greek. Anthropos is Greek for the word, "man." In a sentence such as "pay attention all you MEN," it is clear that the neutral plural is what is intended; i.e., "pay attention all you people."

I would have to have someone show me an example where the conservative IBS rendered God or a pronoun about God into a neutral or a feminine. If they showed me that, I'd be upset because that is so clearly rewriting rather than attempting accurate translation.

I'd also get rid of my NIV Bible as a protest against such a policy by the conservative IBS.

28 posted on 01/28/2002 6:30:08 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FourtySeven; allend; patent; Romulus; wideawake; marshmallow; crazykatz; don-o; JosephW; lambo...
...the new version is aimed at Protestants, and will not appear in an edition with the extra biblical books recognized by Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches.

Plus the pulisher knows they'd be wasting their time even trying!

29 posted on 01/28/2002 6:30:15 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson