Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
He had walked away. He was outside. At that point he was safe and in the right. Too bad for everyone he didn't stay out there.

In my opinion, this was his mistake. He should never have left, but should have resolved the dispute right then and there. By leaving so that he could simmer down, he instead had a chance to fume at the needless humiliation he had suffered at the hands of a worthless little punk. It ate at him quickly, and he could not let it rest. He lost his temper. I think he wanted to beat the punk up - - teach him a lesson real good - - but I don't believe he wanted to kill him. The punk ended up dead, and 6 to 10 is probably about right.
Bravo to our system of justice.

125 posted on 01/27/2002 4:02:39 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
We pretty much agree on the sentence.
134 posted on 01/27/2002 4:29:35 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson