[fod]

yse, dear any criticism of the current administration is labeled as "bashing"these days...funny that the mantra here was that we MUST make sure W is elected and then we'll hold his feet to the fire... now we most wave our pom-poms no matter the cost to liberty or principles.

You seem to be the one who does not realize that for someone to be "given" something has to be taken, and if it taken against your will, it is theft, plain and simple.

a famous man once said the worst tyranny is to make a man pay for something he does not want.

but you don't care and the funny thing is bush is taking us places while we dancing and sining that clinton could not take us kicking and screaming.

and you care not...just tow the party line...

[DittoJed2]

yse, dear any criticism of the current administration is labeled as "bashing"these days...funny that the mantra here was that we MUST make sure W is elected and then we'll hold his feet to the fire... now we most wave our pom-poms no matter the cost to liberty or principles.It is bashing when it is not based on fact. If you read the actual bill and take Bush's exec order into mind, this article is misleading at best and an outright lie at worse. It does not help conservatism to jump into shrill hysterics every time someone brings up a charge against the President. If Bush actually did something supporting abortion, I would join in in criticizing his decision. I did it with his stem cell decision. However, the facts in this case do not support the contention of the article, and thus far we have seen no evidence that our President has suddenly done an about face on his earlier executive order. If the evidence doesn't support it and yet the criticism continues, yes, it is bashing, slander, whatever you call it and it should stop.