Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Without it the South could have competed and created manufacturing and shipping jobs.

But there is no evidence that the south wanted to. No doubt the overwhelming majority of the southern leadership would have agreed with Louis Wigfall when he was speaking to William Howard Russell of The Times shortly after the war began,

"We are an agrarian people; we are a primitive people. We have no cities - we don't want them. We have no literature - we don't need any yet. We have no press - we are glad of it…We have no commercial marine - no navy - we don't want them. We are better without them. Your ships carry our produce and you can protect your own vessels. As long as we have our rice, our sugar, our tobacco, and our cotton, we can command wealth to purchase all we want from those nations with which we are in amity, and to lay up money besides."

In short, the south wanted nothing more that for some foreign power to take on the economic obligations that they had depended on the North to provide prior to the war.

335 posted on 12/20/2001 12:24:40 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Good quote, but the fact is that the North got paid for that shipping. Simple economics, and economies of scale. It would probably be cost prohibitive for the South to create it's own shipping fleet. And of course the North isn't going to be advocating that it foster competition.
340 posted on 12/20/2001 12:50:50 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson