Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aircraft Carrier Names
self | November 19, 2001 | Jim Noble

Posted on 11/19/2001 1:24:55 PM PST by Jim Noble

Question for someone more knowledgeable than I:

When did aircraft carriers stop being named after battles (Saratoga, Lexington) and start being named after minor politicians (Stennis, Vinson)?

This question came up in dinner conversation last night, and I haven't been able to find anyone who knows. Thanks.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Jim Noble
The navy has veered from time to time from the traditional naming of ships. One of our earliest battleships was named after another ship, and not a state [Kearsarge, named after the US ship that sank the Confederate raider Alabama .

Also one of our second world war [I think] carriers was named after a non-existant land in a novel and movie [Shangri La . This was the response that WW II President Roosevelt gave when asked where the bombers came from that initially bombed Tokyo.]

21 posted on 11/19/2001 2:06:40 PM PST by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky
Hey I was a ABH and on my first ship The U.S.S. Independence CV-62 I slept right under Cat-1 but when you work 16 hours a day you can sleep through the cat shuttle slamming into the waterbrakes. I also served aboard The U.S.S. George Washington CVN-73 but when it comes to my first and only love for a ship it will be The Independence and my two years in Japan serving my nation. I really grew up on that ship and was sad to see her decommisoned!!!
22 posted on 11/19/2001 2:13:29 PM PST by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fulbright
The trend has actually been to name them after major Presidents.

Somehow I don't think we're going to see a USS William J. Clinton anytime soon.

23 posted on 11/19/2001 2:19:21 PM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SGCOS
Boomers (SSBN) are States (Ohio), Battleshis are States (Wisconsin), Cruisers (Ticonderoga Class) are battles, Attack Subs are cities (SSN), Destroyers/Frigates are naval soldiers (Oliver Hazard perry Class/Arleigh Burke Class), Carriers are generally presidents as of late though they are named after politicans who favored the navy (Stennis?), historical carrier names (Independence, Enterprise), and in case of the Vinson I think a former NavSec
24 posted on 11/19/2001 2:21:26 PM PST by StAthanasiustheGreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
All the ones that you named are actually CVN (Nuclear) except Kitty Hawk which is conventionally fueled.

I don't know the numbers off-hand.

25 posted on 11/19/2001 2:26:16 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Here are the Nimitz Class Carriers and their numbers:

USS Nimitz (CVN 68), San Diego, Calif.
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), Norfolk, Va.
USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70), Bremerton, Wash.
USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), Norfolk, Va.
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72), Everett, Wash.
USS George Washington (CVN 73), Norfolk, Va.
USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), San Diego, Calif.
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), Norfolk, Va.
Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) (Commisioned and being fitted out)

The other nuclear powered carrier is Enterprise (CVN 65), She is not in the Nimitz class.

26 posted on 11/19/2001 2:36:57 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
And don't forget my personal favorite- USS RANGER (CV 61)!
27 posted on 11/19/2001 2:52:12 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NWU Army ROTC
Vinson I think a former NavSec

Congressman Carl Vinson. I don't mind them naming them after Presidents,who represented the nation as a whole, as long as they stay away from der Sinkmeister. But Congresscritters, many of whom only wanted jobs in their districts, not caring a whit for the Services or Service Members? I don't particularly like that. Surely the Navy has enough historic ship names to use.

28 posted on 11/19/2001 2:53:14 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
It appears that the only consistent rule is that for every rule there is always an exception.
29 posted on 11/19/2001 3:00:09 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Stupid question from a Navy brat who oughta know better: what exactly does "fitted out" mean? I thought the Ronald Reagan was FINISHED. And is there significance to you leaving the USS off the front of only that ship?
30 posted on 11/19/2001 3:05:20 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Don't forget the USS Clinton!

31 posted on 11/19/2001 3:09:11 PM PST by Uni-Poster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Excellent!
32 posted on 11/19/2001 3:15:27 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Naming two of our most significant fleet units after Stennis and Vinson is a disgrace, pure and simple.

Personally, I wouldn't do Presidents, either-but I can see the point of doing it.

How about the USS World Trade Center?

33 posted on 11/19/2001 3:19:50 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Thanks for the link! It was just what I was looking for!
34 posted on 11/19/2001 3:22:46 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Aircraft carriers have always been named by hull number. The Ronald Reagan is CVN76.


BUMP

35 posted on 11/19/2001 3:23:50 PM PST by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
The RONALD REAGAN has not been commisioned yet only christened, her official message traffic will be sent to PCU RONALD REAGAN (Pre Commisioning Unit). The ship is officially named at the christening and actually becomes Navy property and joins the fleet at the commisioning ceremony and becomes USS RONALD REAGAN. Ship names are always written in all capital letters, especially fitting in the case of the USS RONALD REAGAN I would say.
36 posted on 11/19/2001 3:37:21 PM PST by The Squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Don't count on it, Congress now approves all ship names and in many cases assigns them over the objections of the Department of the Navy.
37 posted on 11/19/2001 3:39:32 PM PST by The Squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

USS Hawkbill SSN-666

http://www.usshawkbill.com/

38 posted on 11/19/2001 3:46:32 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dighton
see above
39 posted on 11/19/2001 3:47:14 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The Squid
Oh my goodness. The things I never learned at my Dad's knee! Actually, I was literally knee-high when he had to get out of the Navy. He had dengue fever, and he still gets bouts of it every few years. I guess it's like shingles--if it is going to come back, it will do it again and again.

I am thinking that the all-caps rule must apply only to military vessels, as I haven't seen cruise or cargo ships' names written that way.
40 posted on 11/19/2001 3:48:12 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson