To: CCWoody
I'm a little surprised that you seem to think another discussion of Hebrews 10:14 is needed, given your previous remarks about letting sleeping dogs lie. I am assuming here that your statements were intended to be read at face value.
Do you honestly think that discussing Hebrews 10 again in our little circle (what remains of it anyway) would be of any use? I can't quite imagine it. For one thing, I don't think any of us can be persuaded of another's position. If that is true, then we could only expect rancor from such a profitless discussion, something Paul warned Timothy to avoid. I genuinely doubt that anyone has any fresh material./Well, I guess I actually do but it's only more of the sort of evidence already rejected by you Fourteenists so it would be of little use to post it.
To: George W. Bush
I'm a little surprised that you seem to think another discussion of Hebrews 10:14 is needed, given your previous remarks about letting sleeping dogs lie. I am assuming here that your statements were intended to be read at face value. Discussion is not what I had in mind. This is why I am in support of not having any sleeping dogs and in agreement with Uriel1975.
155 posted on
11/03/2001 10:39:32 AM PST by
CCWoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson