On 31st August, 1938 Hitler approved a memorandum by Jodl dated 24th August, 1938, concerning the timing of the order for the invasion of Czechoslovakia and the question of defense measures. This memorandum contained the following:
"Operation Gruen will be set in motion by means of an 'incident' in Czechoslovakia, which will give Germany provocation for military intervention. The fixing of the exact time for this incident is of the utmost importance."
These facts demonstrate that the occupation of Czechoslovakia had been planned in detail long before the Munich Conference.
In the month of September, 1938, the conferences and talks with military leaders continued. In view of the extraordinarily critical situation which had arisen, the British Prime Minister, Mr. Chamberlain, flew to Munich and then went to Berchtesgaden to see Hitler. On the 22 September Mr. Chamberlain met Hitler for further discussions at Bad Godesberg. On the 26th September, 1938, Hitler said in a speech in Berlin, with reference to his conversation:
"I assured him, moreover, and I repeat it here, that when this problem is solved there will be no more territorial problems for Germany in Europe; and I further assured him that from the moment when Czechoslovakia solves its other problems that is to say, when the Czechs have come to an arrangement with their other minorities, peacefully and without oppression, I will be no longer interested in the Czech State, and that as far as I am concerned I will guarantee it. We don't want any Czechs."
On the 29th September, 1938, after a conference between Hitler and Mussolini and the British and French Prime Ministers in Munich, the Munich Pact was signed, by which Czechoslovakia was required to acquiesce in the cession of the Sudetenland to Germany. The "piece of paper" which the British Prime Minister brought back to London signed by himself and Hitler, expressed the hope that for the future Britain and Germany might live without war. That Hitler never intended to adhere to the Munich Agreement is shown by the fact that a little later he asked the defendant Keitel for information with regard to the military force which in his opinion would be required to break all Czech resistance in Bohemia and Moravia. Keitel gave his reply on the 11th October, 1938. On the 11th October, 1938 a directive was issued by Hitler, and countersigned by the Defendant Keitel, to the Armed Forces on their future tasks, which stated:
"Liquidation of the remainder of Czechoslovakia. It must be possible to smash at any time the remainder of Czechoslovakia if her policy should become hostile towards Germany."
On the 14th March, 1939, the Czech President Hacha and his Foreign Minister Chvalkovsky came to Berlin at the suggestion of Hitler, and attended a meeting at which the Defendants Ribbentrop, Goering, and Keitel were present, with others. The proposal was made to Hacha that if he would sign an agreement consenting to the incorporation of the Czech people in the German Reich at once, Bohemia and Moravia would be saved from destruction. He was informed that German troops had already received orders to march and that any resistance would be broken with physical force. The Defendant Goering added the threat that he would destroy Prague completely from the air. Faced by this dreadful alternative, Hacha and his Foreign Minister put their signatures to the necessary agreement at 4:30 in the morning, and Hitler and Ribbentrop signed on behalf of Germany.
On the 15 March German troops occupied Bohemia and Moravia, and on 16 March the German decree was issued incorporating Bohemia and Moravia into the Reich as a protectorate, and this decree was signed by the Defendants Ribbentrop and Frick.
Israel CANNOT TRUST either the U.N., or the Muslim Empire, and now, sadly the U.S.A. too.
The very 'founding' principle of the Israeli state 'is' SOVEREIGNTY!! ("Never-Again" by anybody!!)
ALL 'SOCIALIST-INTERNATIONALISTS' are the very real potential 'baiters' of Israel!
THE INTERNATIONAL-COALITION is the 'New' U.N. (created out of "America's 'New' War".)
Israel (Sharon) now 'sees' this.
Israel is now going to be 'forced' to newly ALIGN itself with a 'New' CONTINENTAL SOUTHERN EUROPE ALLIANCE!!
IMHO I believe this is how Sharon sees the 'new' NWO situation.
Scary
IMHO
American foreign policy should be predicated on American interests and not those of foreign powers.
I also believe that this nation should comport itself under the aegis of the Just War Doctrine. To date, I am unaware of any actions by the US since 9/11 that would be opposed to the principles contained within such a doctrine of conduct.
Sursum Corda
"we will use nuclear weapons if you do not support us as we wish"
Israel is threatening the U.S. as much as they are the arabs.
This after Israel provided us with loads of intelligence after Sept 11th. I guess we're just handing it over to Iran, Syria and Pakistan.
I think you all have it wrong. This is just a big show for the local Arab/Muslim consumption. We know that the only state in the middle east that is truely sided with America is Israel. The President's plan is to have everyone in our camp (including the Arab/Muslim nations AND Israel) against the terrorists. The President talks sweet to the Arab/Muslim nations and tough to Israel. Then the Arab/Muslim nations side with the US. We already know that Israel is our friend. So we got 'em all in the camp! Game, set, match. Checkmate, Mr. Bin Laden. The game is over!
I think this should read: We have been perpetuating terrorism for over 100 years. Especially considering Sharon precipitated the latest Intifada. See following:
"In the real world, Violence is not like the weather. Somebody does it, and we can usually identify the patch of clouds responsible for the rain. So it was, that when the ‘Mitchell’ process was invoked and the daily quota of killed slowly crawled down, the Jewish supremacists replayed the provocative visit of Sharon to the Haram a-Sharif by laying the cornerstone of the Third Temple.
Immediately after the cornerstone provocation, Israel followed up with a wave of assassinations in Nablus, Ramallah and elsewhere, trying to get Palestinians to respond in kind. It seems to be a pattern. Last September, after Sharon’s visit to Haram a-Sharif, Israeli Border Police murdered seven worshippers in the Jerusalem mosque and ushered in the second Intifada. Sharon’s assassins did not stop murders until a suicide bomber obliged by responding.
It is no coincidence. Israel wants the Palestinian uprising to go on. Israel wants not peace, but low intensity conflict. A war with Palestinians allows the Israeli leaders to keep their heterogeneous communities together, away from each other’s throat. What is more important, the war allows the Jewish leaders over the world to continue their arduous task of reviving World Jewry, a medieval run-down construct. That is why it makes no sense to speak against ‘Violence’ and for ‘Peace’. As long as the supremacist Jewish state exists, it will ensure violence and avoid peace.
The recent assassinations also had the intent of covering up the cornerstone provocation under a heap of corpses. The meaning of this obscure ceremony was further obscured by the mainstream media, and all references to it mysteriously vaporized. For instance, Reuters reported on August 3, 2001: ‘Israeli police stormed the Temple Mount, revered by Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif, after Palestinians threw stones at Jews worshipping at the Western Wall below’.
Why, all of a sudden, did Palestinians begin to stone Jews? The cornerstone story was omitted, and the average American or European was left with the impression that the ‘wild‘ Muslims attacked peaceful worshipping Jews just out of spite. On this count, the unanimity of the English-language media was horrifying. The BBC, once more objective than American networks, closed the gap. They also reported of ‘Israeli soldiers who entered the mosques responding to the Muslim stone throwers’, moving a reference to the cornerstone to the end of the item. It now appears that the airing of the BBC documentary on Sharon was a singular act of courage that will not soon be repeated.
As for the American networks, their coverage continues to be consistent. They market the Israeli line without hesitation." By Israel Shamir from Cornerstone of Violence
Support for Israel is as strong as it has ever been. I personally think we should support Israel to the hilt. But we need to be smart about that support. If a sham argument accomplishes what we want, and keeps the Arabs as quiet as possible, then all the better.....