Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'US called off first attacks'
This is London ^ | October 3, 2001 | Jeremy Campbell

Posted on 10/03/2001 10:18:54 AM PDT by PrivacyChampion

'US called off first attacks' by Jeremy Campbell in Washington The United States and Britain yesterday called off military strikes against terrorist targets in Afghanistan at the last minute.

Washington officials say today that a severe attack of last-minute cold feet by some key Arab members of the coalition caused President Bush to postpone the operation.

The waverers are Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan and Oman, and US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is embarking on an urgent mission today to strengthen nerves in these countries.

Prime Minister Tony Blair is also about to undertake a hasty visit to the region. Saudi Arabia's support is especially vital, because Allied aircraft and commanders need its base facilities.

Two senior US officials have told reporters that until yesterday the Saudis were firm in their offer to provide assistance for strikes, including use of a state-of-the-art command centre at the Prince Royal Sultan Air Force Base.

Then the situation changed. One US official told Knight Newspapers: "That is no longer true. We fear there is something deeper here."

Mr Rumsfeld's trip to the Middle East is intended to mend these unexpected ruptures.

Downing Street, meanwhile, confirmed Mr Blair will be departing on a mission tomorrow but refused, on security grounds, to be drawn on any of the detail. Amid clear unease over the advance leaks of the trip, a spokesman dismissed all reports as "speculationî maintaining that some of the suggested calling points for the Prime Minister were simply wrong.

Mr Rumsfeld's tour, which includes Saudi Arabia, Oman, Egypt and Uzbekistan, is being compared to the stage-setting trip made by Dick Cheney, then Defence Secretary, to the Gulf just before the start of Desert Storm.

This time there is more at stake. Near the top of Mr Rumsfeld's list of priorities is to talk his way to an agreement with Uzbekistan, on the northern border of Afghanistan, to use the country as a staging area for the attack.

Uzbekistan is now regarded as a potential key asset in the coming showdown, but is rated the coalition's single most fragile link.

Highly attractive to the US are the number of abandoned air bases there, once used by the Soviet Union.

This will be Mr Rumsfeld's first face-to-face meeting with the ruling regime there. It has demanded that the US negotiate a complete Status of Forces Agreement before it will permit the use of its military bases - an unrealistic condition which could be tangled up in legal knots for years.

The trip, undertaken at the request of President Bush, is expected to last three days.

Oman, also skittish, is regarded as an important support base for a ground incursion. US special operations forces can be flown there and then put on amphibious invasion ships.

US officials are not sure whether this is a case of last minute jitters, or " something more serious".

One notable omission on Mr Rumsfeld's itinerary is Pakistan. "The last thing Pakistan needs is a high profile visit by a US Secretary of Defence," said a Pentagon official.

The country is contending with ferocious anti-American demonstrations, with Mr Bus burned in effigy and hordes shouting: "Death to America! Let Americans come here to be buried!"

Washington officials advised reporters not to assume military action was only hours away. They stressed that Mr Bush will act only when he is convinced, by Mr Rumsfeld and others, that "all the pieces are in place". Such action will come "at various stages and times", they said. The President himself told reporters there is "no calendar" for the start of hostilities.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: PrivacyChampion
Not so fast....

This "information" has not been released without consideration of it's impact on all of the parties involved. Either the information is correct, and the politicians want everyone to know that attacks are imminent, or the information is false and the politicians want to gage the response of all parties. Either way, don't be stunned, this is a multifaceted card game and bluffing is a legitimate strategy.

21 posted on 10/03/2001 10:40:04 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VoodooEconomist
"this is what happens when race trumps competence."

And your statement is what happens when ignorance trumps reason.

Race has nothing to do with any of this, except in the limited minds of some.

Look, I'm in favor of decisive military action as much as the next guy -- probably more -- but did it ever occur to you that Powell is NOT Secretary of Defense, he's Secretary of State, and it's his JOB to present the diplomatic options, not the military options, to the President?

22 posted on 10/03/2001 10:40:34 AM PDT by Hari_Seldon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: tallhappy
I tell what's wrong, trying to appease a bunch of moderate Arabs that deep-down are glad this happened to the U.S.A., that's what's wrong. I'm ready to go it along with true allies, western allies that'll stand with us. Screw this idiots...I view them as much an enemy as bin Laden and Hussein.
24 posted on 10/03/2001 10:42:21 AM PDT by PrivacyChampion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
BTW, did anyone catch the start of Rush Limbaugh this afternoon. Tony Snow was griping about the media being kicked off Rumsfeld's plane ...

Do we all know for sure that Rumsfeld is even going overseas? It's possible that the Bush Administration is making it appear that he is ... since the terrorists will assume that they won't be hit while the SecDef is in the warzone ...
25 posted on 10/03/2001 10:42:24 AM PDT by gkidman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
What Bush said: "You are with us, or you are with the terrorist."

Translation: "You are with us, or unless you have oil, you are with the terrorists."

26 posted on 10/03/2001 10:42:43 AM PDT by aomagrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VoodooEconomist
This excursion to bring the skittish back on board is supposed to be Powells job. His tit is still in the wringer over his comments last week. Had to send Rumsfeld instead.
27 posted on 10/03/2001 10:43:39 AM PDT by latrans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: newblood
Yeah but, I like bush better.

me too.

28 posted on 10/03/2001 10:44:47 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
I guess the "your either with us or with the terrorist" speech wasn't all it was cracked up to be.
29 posted on 10/03/2001 10:45:16 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hari_Seldon
Let us not forget that as Chairman of the JCS that he DID NOT want to take military action against Iraq for invading Kuwait. Also, we had the opportunity to smash the remainder of Hussein's Republican Guard and he was opposed to that. In my view, he lacks the will to fight a fight and that's a poor excuse for a general as well as a diplomat.
30 posted on 10/03/2001 10:45:34 AM PDT by PrivacyChampion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gkidman
I hope you're right, I'm just pretty GD frustrated here
31 posted on 10/03/2001 10:47:43 AM PDT by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Don't be too quick to leap to conclusions. Last night was a full moon. Would YOU want to do a SpecOps action then? Be patient. There are good reasons why we are not attacking immediately.
32 posted on 10/03/2001 10:48:10 AM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Up to now, I've been in favor of the coalition building Bush has been doing. But what we need now, more than anything, is a "Jimmy Doolittle" type raid to bolster the morale of the nation. Doolittle's raid on Tokyo, as most here know, had little significance from a strategic point of view, but it was a tremendous uplift for America, and it told the Japanese that they were not safe on their own homeland. We need something like that, and quick.

As for the precious coalition, screw them all! When we get done with mopping up the terrorist networks, I say we move in and replace the government of Saudi Arabia. These guys are corrupt; they live off the wealth of the nation's oil production, with little going back into the welfare of the nation in general; they have little support from their own people. The world would be a better place without them. In the meantime, we need to roll -- with them, or without them.

33 posted on 10/03/2001 10:48:21 AM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
There are one or two reasons for this sudden reversal.

1. Ultra-secret and extremely credible (and terrifying) assassination threats against the leaders personally.
2. Ultra-secret requests for more American bribe money, er, aid money.

34 posted on 10/03/2001 10:52:53 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
I think it's time to send some people in our Government a copy of Machiavelli's "The Prince". Or a least the page which states "It is better to be feared than loved."
35 posted on 10/03/2001 10:54:45 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
you are correct, sir. The longer we wait to respond, the more hand wringing and the more backing out of support we will see. We should have attacked immediately, stongly, then occupied. But we are looking like the PC pansies we have become.....
36 posted on 10/03/2001 10:54:46 AM PDT by Capt.YankeeMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: damian5
Heartily agree. The fact that people do not mess lightly with the Russians or the Israelis has nothing to do with their being well liked.
37 posted on 10/03/2001 10:55:08 AM PDT by NorthGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
"I am stunned in disbelief."

I'm not, this what happens when you fight a war by commitee, especially ones that include the enemy. Right now we have lost and terrorism is the most effective weapon any country could have in it's arsenal against the weak, cowardly and liberal west.

38 posted on 10/03/2001 10:56:08 AM PDT by okie_tech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
Color me skeptical about this report. No source other than "This is London"?? Morning news said Rumsfeld is signing status of forces (basing) agreements in Asia, which is his job. Someone else (probably Powell) would be dispatched to fix a rift in the coalition. Also on the news, elements of the 10th Mountain got a movement order to Central Asia to provide a reserve and security, consistent with Rumsfeld inking final basing agreements. As has been reported incessantly, the Kitty Hawk is not yet on station. My sense is we're close, but not quite ready. Plus, I urge the hand wringers to remember we've been hearing a lot of, "oh gosh, there are problems to solve and we need more time," lately - I suspect for a very good reason.
39 posted on 10/03/2001 10:57:35 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivacyChampion
I see pretty much everybody here is ignoring the obvious. We will attack when we are ready to attack. In the meantime, it is to our advantage to create confusion. Ever hear the fable about the boy who cried wolf? How many times now have the Taliban scrambled into their shelters, expecting an immediate attack? Sooner or later, they are going to stop taking these alarms seriously. And that is when we are going to hit them and hit them hard.

It's like having a fire drill at work several times a week. At first, everybody vacates the building quickly. But after a few days, people start getting aggravated. They start shuffling out with their hands in their pockets. Some of them begin to just ignore the alarms and stay at their desks. After a while, it all becomes a big joke. When was the last time anybody ever took a car alarm seriously?

I think this is the perfect setup. Let the press think the attack is "imminent" and keep pulling back. Make it seem like we don't have the support or we don't have the resolve. Pretty soon, the Taliban aren't going to take us seriously either. In the meantime, we have all this extra time to get additional forces and materials into place so that when we finally do strike, not only do we catch them off guard but we attack with overwhelming force.

40 posted on 10/03/2001 10:59:00 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson