Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 68 grunt
But, revisiting ...

You said, "My real stance was that if a woman meets the exact same physical and psychological demands, and agrees and understands that there will be not type of preferential treatment in any way or form due to their sex, then perhaps they should be allowed to if they desire. Off hand, I don't see our society accepting it anytime soon, nor do I foresee many women agreeing to those terms, or meeting the requirements.

To which I responded, "In combat units a bond is formed between brothers. You value your brother's life more than your own. This bond is very akin to love. You mix a split-tail in with these warriors and this bond, this love and dedication, will become confused and corrupted. Unnecessary chances would be taken to protect her. Her friends would be perceived as 'favored', resentment would develop, unit cohesion would suffer.

I continue to feel this way. Semper Fi

391 posted on 10/03/2001 11:02:15 AM PDT by 68 grunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: 68 grunt, COB1

Reminds me of "Survivor". :-)

BTW, Rudy says, "Let me at 'em". Now that's a warhorse I wouldn't mind sharing a bunker with.

397 posted on 10/03/2001 1:20:03 PM PDT by CHIEF negotiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt
I was going to say something on those exact lines. It's not just the women, it's the men as well.

It doesn't matter if it's "right" or "good" or even (god forbid) "enlightened", it just is!

Semper Fi and Let's Roll!

410 posted on 10/03/2001 8:40:36 PM PDT by dpa5923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson