To: CounterCounterCulture
I have one problem.A 2001 calander printed in may.That don't make any sence.
To: eastforker
NEWSMAX is at it again.
To: eastforker
I have one problem.A 2001 calander printed in may.That don't make any sence. You are forgetting the story of the frog and the scorpion who wanted to cross the river...
To: eastforker
It makes sense if it is a school calendar, or if it is an Islamic calendar.
To: eastforker
I have one problem.A 2001 calander printed in may.That don't make any sence. Well, we are just celebrating the new years here in Israel.
To: eastforker
Yeah, to my recollection, most calendars are made the yr before.
46 posted on
09/27/2001 1:38:29 PM PDT by
stuartcr
To: eastforker
A 2001 calendar printed in May. Our calendar is Christian, credited to Pope Gregory XIII. Muslims likely start their year differently.
79 posted on
09/27/2001 4:30:01 PM PDT by
Reeses
To: eastforker
It should have been issued in March. Isn't this month the sixth?
80 posted on
09/27/2001 4:30:08 PM PDT by
eniapmot
To: eastforker
Lots of calendars are printed in the middle of the year for schools. They are designed to cover the schoold year, running from one summer to the next summber.
Which, of course, makes this calendar even worse. Not only was it given to children, but it was specificly designed to be given out in schools.
To: eastforker
the islamic calendar is in a state of flux, not fixed like ours. It changes from year to year. Their new year started in april. As they could not predict the future, they were not able to put the calendar out till may.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson