Okay. I'll stand by my words. If you advocate legalization of drugs, then you are a terrorist and should be treated as one.
Thanks, loser. Keep it up. Keep telling the world that people should be jailed or killed for having opinions you don't like. Then try to explain how you're different from the rest of the fascist and communist monsters, or how the society you'd like to see would differ from the hellholes they created.
You condemn yourself further every time you open your mouth or touch your keyboard. But then, you who have neither defensible morals nor sense enough to know when you've hanged yourself with your own words will hardly recognize the implications of your hatred-drenched "position."
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
Let's talk about that for a moment. Let's talk about people who condemn themself every time they open their mouth.
Specifically, let's try and get a little perspective on the complicated present by reviewing an aspect of the past that's pretty well understood.
Just about 160 years ago, a war on drugs was being waged. Britain was conducting a war on China and China was fighting back. Britain had at least four motives for this war. (1) Britain wanted to make tons of money selling drugs to China. (2) Britain wanted to dictate to China what China's foreign policies should be re trade. (3) Britain wanted to dictate to China what China's internal policies should be re imports. (4) Britain wanted to make sure that China never had the option of changing it's relatively isolationist policies and adopting a globalist agenda of its own by weakening the will of the Chinese people and balkanizing the population.
Now. In this context, what do you guys suppose the Chinese people would have called a Chinese person who went around yelling that the enemy wasn't Britain, but rather that the enemy was the Chinese government? What do you suppose the Chinese people would have called a Chinese person who encouraged people to stop fighting Britain and become activists against the Chinese government? What do you suppose the Chinese people would have called such a person?
Would they have called him a helpless peasant who didn't even have the brains to realize China was at war? Or would they have called him a scumbag traitor, collaborating with the enemy by opening an internal front to weaken the will of the people while a war was in progress?
Well, everyone can answer that question for themselves.
Enough of the past. Now let's see if what we've learned can be applied to the present.
Here were are in modern America. We have a country under seige from drug traffickers. We have globalist activists from multinational interest groups seeking to define America's foreign trade policies. We have globalist activists from multinational interest groups seeking to define America's internal policies. And we have Blue Nation America constantly promoting cultural activism which balkanizes the American population.
And, today, we have people yelling that the enemy is our own government. Today, we have people saying we shouldn't fight the drug traffickers and the globalists exploiting them, but should become activists against our own government.
Hmmm. What should we call such people? What would you call such people?
Mark W.