Interestingly, there is very good evidence that the point of impact at the Pentagon was Providential to say the least. The director of the renovation project was on C-SPAN last Saturday with a briefing which clearly showed that the plane managed to hit the only spot on the building which had been reinforced (on the inside) and had it hit anywhere but "wedge 1" the damage would have been much, much greater.
No may have noticed the big "slab" of building leaning in. That was the reinforced segment. He also pointed out that the only windows which were out were those actually physically hit by the plane. The rest of the so-called "blast-proof" windows stayed in place.
And, of course, the offices (for the most part) weren't yet occupied. That also held casualties down.
In the face of that great tragedy, it was a wonderous thing that the Arab monkeys 'botched' their worthless entry into Hell.
It seems like this information on C-SPAN would also be unwise to divulge. Why tell people that if you take another shot, you will do much better because the rest of the building isn't reinforced?
I just don't get it. Our need for information surely doesn't include this type of information, does it?