connectthedots:And just exactly what was your son-in-law's excuse for telling you?
BACK OFF !!!!!!!! I am speaking only of generalities; nothing top secret or anything. How dare you insinuate anything unethical or wrong. Get off your high and mighty !!!!!!!!!!
Your post at #121 certainly does not imply generalities, does it? After all if you can't/won't elaborate on it, there must have been something more than 'generalities'; or is it that you merely wanted others to think you know some inside information that most others don't.
BTW, how would you even know if something was top secret? There are also two lower levels of classification; 'secret' and 'confidential'.
Personally, I don't think your son-in-law told you anything and that you just wanted others to think you were somehow superior by having them think you have inside info when you really don't.
I think you would have been better off by not making the post in #121 and once you did, you should have just let my remark pass by without comment.
I think you are mostly embarassed that you made a statement that was the exact reason someone started this thread.
I think you would have been better off by not making the post in #121 and once you did, you should have just let my remark pass by without comment.
I think you are mostly embarassed that you made a statement that was the exact reason someone started this thread.
I don't know what you problem is and you have no clue as to what you're talking about. I made no statement other than the one post and I am not embarrassed about anything. Are you mentally unbalanced or something?
I didn't let your remark pass because you needed to be called on for it. I'm telling you again to get off my back. What's more, you haven't the slightest idea who I am or who I am associated with.
Unlike you, I am not trying to make anyone think anything other than what I said. Your statement of "inside info" is a product of your imagination. You're a sniveling little worm that must be desperate for a response. I guess the only way you get attention is to make outlandish and unfounded comments. What a sad fool you are !!!!!!!!
When I said I wouldn't elaborate I meant that I wouldn't explain my son-in-law's job and still won't. Because of your irrational response, I looked at your recent posts. You obviously have a thing for military business and Tom Clancy. Apparently you are military (active or retired) that never held an important job or you are a wannbabe military guy. Either way, you are pathetic.