Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US appeals court keeps in place Pentagon's escort policy for journalists
Rueters ^ | 7/16/26

Posted on 07/16/2026 8:43:29 PM PDT by CFW

A federal appeals court sided with President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday in a case brought by The New York Times over ​the Pentagon's press access restrictions. Press freedom advocates have criticized policy changes ‌under the Trump administration that limited journalists' access to the Pentagon, saying they suppressed freedom of speech, opens new tab.

A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said ​the Pentagon's policy requiring government escorts for journalists at the Pentagon ​could stand. It overturned a decision by a judge at ⁠a lower court.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appealscourt; hegseth; journalists; pentagon
Once again, the Trump administration wins at the higher court. Federal judges are way out of their lane.
1 posted on 07/16/2026 8:43:29 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

You can read the order and dissent here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73576883/01208870018/new-york-times-company-v-dod/


2 posted on 07/16/2026 8:43:59 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Good


3 posted on 07/16/2026 8:46:11 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Excellent!


4 posted on 07/16/2026 8:57:32 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The “journalist” never had a problem with Biden and Obama controlling the actual questions they could ask.


5 posted on 07/16/2026 9:44:52 PM PDT by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is good and also funny as hell. Smart ass urinalists don’t just have the run of the place.


6 posted on 07/16/2026 10:08:24 PM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Don’t you all just love every time Libs run to a Federal Judge to get something overturned which Trump did? I remember all the times we did to Biden…… 🤔🤔🤔….. never mind.


7 posted on 07/17/2026 12:09:19 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
It's funny (not really) how every leftist POS in this country has 'standing' to sue for any ole reason or no reason at all. Who in their right mind (talking to you activist judges) thought that the Pentagon has no control over who comes and goes and who has access and who does not? retards

All fed circuit courts need to be dissolved and reconstituted with some very strict written in stone guidelines. Unfortunately, we are stuck with a seditious do nothing congress. What this country really needs is a wholesale replacement of our con-gre$$/sinate. They're all criminal frauds, parasites. Incumbent should be a dirty word stricken from our language.

8 posted on 07/17/2026 3:06:31 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (FTL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I thought that escorts were journalists.


9 posted on 07/17/2026 5:14:04 AM PDT by Mouton (There is a new sheriff and deputy in town now! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ... overturned a decision by a judge at ⁠a lower court.”

I wonder if the Court of Appeals overturned the worm Boasberg.


10 posted on 07/17/2026 5:20:30 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys. P. J. O'Rourk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Well, the new policy should be...no unauthorized persons past the lobby. EOFS!

😊👍🇺🇸


11 posted on 07/17/2026 6:49:30 AM PDT by rktman (Patriotism not 'hateriotism' !. Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Press freedom advocates have criticized policy changes ‌under the Trump administration that limited journalists' access to the Pentagon,

No, I think you call those people "Trump haters".

12 posted on 07/17/2026 7:27:50 AM PDT by libertylover (The HBM (Has Been Media) is almost all AGENDA-DRIVEN and HATE-DRIVEN, not-truth driven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

HUZZAH!


13 posted on 07/17/2026 8:07:17 AM PDT by Taxman (We will never be a truly free people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover; Taxman

I can’t believe there was even a question about the issue.

The only reason journalists wanted free range to do as they wish was to find confidential information, twist it to suit their narrative, and then report something to criticize the President and Sec of War.


14 posted on 07/17/2026 10:25:00 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Thankfully!


15 posted on 07/17/2026 10:29:47 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens. --DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I thought that escorts were journalists.

Presstitutes.

16 posted on 07/17/2026 10:30:41 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens. --DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Well, the new policy should be...no unauthorized persons past the lobby. EOFS!


Actually, to a great degree this has always been the case. Pentagon workers have their own ID badge they have to swipe for entrance. If you are a visitor, the badge you get depends on your “customer”. If you visit frequently, such as being on a development project, you may be granted a “no escort” badge. If your someone like me that visited less frequently, I was issued an “escort required” badge. You even had to be escorted to the bathroom.

Those press weenies need escorts —for the most part they aren’t loyal to the country, but to their “gotcha” stories and this should require a No Escort badge to prevent a lot of harm to the country. With recording and photograph devices getting smaller, who knows what they could get to sell for fame and fortune. As I was told in many security briefings, both on customer site and by my company, most home grown American spies don’t do it for the ideology, but for the money, plain and simple.

Now.....after 911 everyone had to go through a scanner. I hope they still do that. (retired in 2018).


17 posted on 07/17/2026 10:57:28 AM PDT by duckbutt (I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Yup. Also urinalists


18 posted on 07/17/2026 10:57:33 AM PDT by Mouton (There is a new sheriff and deputy in town now! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson