Posted on 11/09/2025 8:16:37 AM PST by TBP
Actually saw a video on him this morning. yezhov.
He was Stalin’s right hand man, says he sentenced 700,000 people to be murdered in 2 years. Who knows how many other unofficially or sentenced to Siberia where they died from Typhus or starvation.
That famous photo is after Stalin picked his new guy, Beria (equally murderous but a rapist to boot). Stalin had all image of him, newspapers everything edited. He was made to disappear.
Said he was 4’11” and weighed maybe 120, but he killed multitudes. Why I don’t share the sentiment from the right not to take ANTIFA serous because they are wimps.
No you were duped. Tell my what positives have resulyed from supporting this conflict? I can name millions of negatives. Can you name even one positive, and that the cost justified that positive, if you can even name one positive.
Furthermore, Russia did not draw the Red Lines regarding NATO expansion of Finland or Sweden, as it did with Georgia & Ukraiine.
Sorry, but your arguments fail to make the case that being delibertely belliherent to Russia was necessary or beneficial to the security of the U.S..
I also notivce that you resude to even speak on the evil that Biden did to our nation.
and Putin help me get elected. Remember when Obama said he’d be more flexible to do whatever Putin wanted after he was re-elected.
Amazing how many that claime they don’t support Putin come out of the woodwork to defend him!
Amazing how many that claim they don’t support Putin come out of the woodwork to defend him!
“Are you sure you aren’t being duped by The Hill?”
Are you sure you aren’t being duped by The Putin?
If you look through the thread most of comments just assume The Hill is accurate. I have my doubts. (I have my doubts about Putin as well). Truth is hard to find today.
“If you look through the thread most of comments just assume The Hill is accurate.”
If I look at your post you are demeaning a person that posts information not favorable to Putin.
What do you think that implies?
I was just observing The Hill, like the NY Times, isn’t the Gospel. If the NY Times prints something I agree with I always do a double check of my assessment. A stopped clock is correct twice a day, however.
While much of Putin says is questionable, in IMHO he probably has a little bit better record than the NY Times.
#”I was just observing The Hill, like the NY Times, isn’t the Gospel”
Nope. You demeaned a poster since he posted unfavorably regarding Putin.
“While much of Putin says is questionable, in IMHO he probably has a little bit better record than the NY Times.”
Thanks for clarifying your pro-Putin bias.
I guess you are clarifying your NY Times bias.
You brought up the NYT. Not me. I am only discussing how you use Alinsky tactics to demean a person for posting material unfavorable to Putin.
I also note that in several posts you have not denied being pro-Putin.
“I also note that in several posts you have not denied being pro-Putin.”
Re 51 “While much of Putin says is questionable,”
That is pro-Putin? LOL
You didnt finish the sentence...
” “While much of Putin says is questionable,”
LOL
He is a pathological liar.
putler puffer!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.