Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. judge blocks Trump administration move to overhaul health agencies
CNBC ^ | 7/1/25 | reuters

Posted on 07/01/2025 11:50:54 AM PDT by CFW

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from moving forward with plans to overhaul the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services by reorganizing several of its agencies and substantially cutting their workforce.

U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose in Providence, Rhode Island, issued an injunction at the behest of a group of Democratic-led states who challenged a plan HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr announced in March to consolidate agencies and fire 10,000 of the department’s employees.

The layoffs, in addition to earlier buyout offers and firings of probationary employees, reduced the number of full-time HHS employees to 62,000 from 82,000 and left key offices unable to perform statutory functions, the states alleged.

The 19 states that sued, along with the District of Columbia, challenged HHS’s implementation of its restructuring plan, which also called for collapsing 28 divisions into 15 and closing half of its 10 regional offices.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2; dubose; federaljudges; hhs; injunctions; interference; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; melissadubose; noauthority; nojurisdiction; obstruction; rhodeisland; sabotage; scotus; unconstitutional; undermining; unlawfulorders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Injunction, junction, what's my function!?
1 posted on 07/01/2025 11:50:54 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

None. of. her. damned. business.


2 posted on 07/01/2025 11:52:11 AM PDT by jimfree (My 22 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

And which President appointed this judge?!


3 posted on 07/01/2025 11:52:23 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Do what that district court judge did after the Supreme Court overruled him/her they/them. Ignore it.


4 posted on 07/01/2025 11:53:22 AM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Inefficient government bloat is essential to ‘democracy’.


5 posted on 07/01/2025 11:53:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Well I guess the injunction is only good in the “massive” state of Rhode Island according to the SCOTUS ruling last week.


6 posted on 07/01/2025 11:54:06 AM PDT by DallasBiff (Apology not accepted.la is not the sharpest knife in the drawer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Why are judges allowed to run the government, she belongs in prison.


7 posted on 07/01/2025 11:54:08 AM PDT by Ronald77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This judge is not only a Biden appointee, but assumed office January 2, 2025, as one of the last minute saboteurs the democrats put in place. Her only qualification is that she’s a black lesbian communist.


8 posted on 07/01/2025 11:54:53 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I guess this judge chick thinks she is above the Supreme Court.


9 posted on 07/01/2025 11:55:51 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Misfunction junction.


10 posted on 07/01/2025 11:56:52 AM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Yeah means NOTHING the Supreme Court already ruled that these judges have ZERO say


11 posted on 07/01/2025 11:57:15 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Even with a slim majority the GOP could pass a law that changes the chief executives ability to change, restructure, downsize, collapse, eliminate or join any federal agency and just like federal regulations requiring a separate House and Senate 2/3 majority to oppose the moves. After the simple language of that the bill would list by name every federal agency, subagency, department, agency and department unit, in one paragraph for that unit that simply says the forging authority over this federal government unit is hereby authorized to the President.


12 posted on 07/01/2025 12:00:49 PM PDT by Wuli (uire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Well I guess the injunction is only good in the “massive” state of Rhode Island according to the SCOTUS ruling last week.

I could be wrong but I thought the ruling said that injunctions were limited to the district of the judge and/or the states that were suing. In this case, 19 such states.

So this begs a question: if you issue an injunction preventing the President from structuring a portion of the executive branch to his liking and it applies to 1 or 2 or 30 states, how can he proceed since he can't set up separate departments for each suing state. So this injunction would have the same effect as a nationwide one, from a practical perspective.

IF I'm write in my understanding of SCOTUS ruling.

13 posted on 07/01/2025 12:02:27 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie ("We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. F. B. I. is tending in that direction." - Harry S Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Federal Judicial Service:

Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Nominated by Joseph Biden on January 19, 2024, to a seat vacated by William E. Smith.

Confirmed by the Senate on March 12, 2024, and received commission on January 2, 2025.

Education: Providence College, B.A., 1990

Roger Williams University School of Law, J.D., 2004

Professional Career:

Teacher in Providence Public Schools, 1990-2004

Special Assistant Attorney of the Rhode Island Attorney General’s Office, 2005-2008

Senior Legal Counsel for Schneider Electric, 2008-2019

Rhode Island District Court Judge, 2019-2024

Other Professional Service:

Serves on the Roger Williams University School of Law’s Board of Directors and chairs the board’s Diversity & Inclusion Committee

Member of the Committee on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in Rhode Island Courts, Chairs the Public Engagement and Education subcommittee

RI Foundation Board as Chief Justice Suttell’s designee, 2021

14 posted on 07/01/2025 12:05:15 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

While this is happening the 20,000 employees are not sitting around waiting to get called back they’re moving on which accomplishes the objective regardless what the judges say.


15 posted on 07/01/2025 12:05:47 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I thought SCOTUS settled this last week.


16 posted on 07/01/2025 12:05:55 PM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

another day, another injunction


17 posted on 07/01/2025 12:06:50 PM PDT by onona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
Her only qualification is that she’s a black lesbian communist.

And she graduated from a law school that US News ranks No. 169 out of 187.

18 posted on 07/01/2025 12:07:46 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Organization of a department is an executive function, not a judicial one...................


19 posted on 07/01/2025 12:08:32 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given

It doesn’t make any difference who appointed the judge-Presidents have to allow some Leftist judges in because otherwise, they cannot get judges they support though the judicial committee and onto the bench. It’s all a give and take thing.

Sadly.


20 posted on 07/01/2025 12:09:43 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson