Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeWarrior

That really is and should remain the province of the operating system.

Allowing 3rd party software direct access to the kernel is asking for trouble.


8 posted on 07/22/2024 11:19:28 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

You want to trust MSFT with all your system security?


9 posted on 07/22/2024 11:37:17 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down seven times, stand up eight. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!; All

“Allowing 3rd party software direct access to the kernel is asking for trouble.”

FWIW...When I was at Intel, no vendor... NOBODY was allowed to automatically update software. Or any equipment firmware.

They built an isolated testing environment and manually loaded ALL, ALL updates there to test. After rigorous testing, Intel would push the software themselves.

Yes, they were a little behind the curve on “zero day” exploits, but had security systems and protocols that minimized any damage.

And they NEVER had enterprise-wide outages. Never.

It’s what all responsible companies do.

All those IT Directors and Security Directors who are complaining about the bad Crowdstrike update should be fired.


12 posted on 07/22/2024 1:43:44 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson