The actual comment was: If a voter does not have acceptable identification, they can still cast a provisional ballot. Election officials will verify the voter’s eligibility before counting the ballot.
Providing only part of the information is what Democrats regularly do. We are better than them. With the full context it becomes clear that the partial comment only pertained to provisional ballots not mail-in ballots.
Immediately following that were the following statements. The first from Arizona rules, the second from me:
1) It’s worth noting that Arizona does not require ID for mail-in voting. 2) That's where the real problem comes from.
I finished with my comment:
That's where large numbers of voters make the difference. Encouraging all of us to go vote regardless of the cheating.
Thanks for the reply. I was not disputing the mail-in problems that you posted. I agree that mail-ins are a huge problem. However, I think you will agree that AZ Dems will seize every opportunity to take advantage of loose election security. Even if we are successful at tightening mail-in procedures, I don’t trust election officials to properly verify the voters’ eligibility. I hope that concern is not necessary, but it seems that no matter what we do, they have another trick.