Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt

1. Trump was NOT running his businesses in 2017. His kids were. THE CHECKS were signed electronically.

2. I have done accounting/bookkeeping since 1957-—am 84.

3. I would have posted a legal bill as such any time...especially when that same lawyer had done lots of prior work for me. AS I understand-— COHEN did NOT ITEMIZE any of his invoices—like you get at Home Depot, etc.

PICKING APART every invoice is called “TRYING TO PICK THE FLY CRAP OUT OF THE BLACK PEPPER” in Accounting.


17 posted on 07/16/2024 4:44:06 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ridesthemiles

Thank you for additional detail and some very cogent points.

This was a corrupt political prosecution. There is a good chance it will fall apart with the requirement of a hearing to establish Presidential immunity and the elimination of much of the prosecutions case. This hearing is mandated by the SC ruling.

Material subject to Presidential immunity was included in testimony elicited in court by the prosecutors. The defense objected before the material was presented which allows the defense to push for a remedy now that their objections have been vindicated. If the material covered by immunity is deemed sufficient to potentially change the verdict if removed or to have hampered a proper defense the only remedy is to set aside the verdict.


18 posted on 07/16/2024 4:55:44 PM PDT by JayGalt (DEI = Didn’t Earn It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson