Good thing nobody actually injected that crap into their body
I feel bad for the suckers who took this garbage, and were all morally superior about it.
Guess I’m cynical. First thought is, “what’s it paving the way for?”
“ plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient”
Even that is debatable or questionable.
(Side issue to this case).
for later
Wow! And it’s the 9th?
And Pfizer hides its data for decades because it wants this and the claims around it to be nothing.
Bankrupt Pfizer!
Okay. What did you do with the actual 9th circus court?
Good.
Bankrupt Pfizer & Moderna instead of Alex Jones.
This is a recycling of the same bogus story from another like publication from over a month ago - “playing telephone” like the MSM does to recycle nonsense and keep a false narrative going. And of course, like always, if you go to the actual opinion, they were ruling on the rationale for the dismissal, not making any final findings of fact, and the section they claim was a “finding” in this and the other article was where they were summarizing the claims made by each of the parties, not stating either were their own findings - that is what a judge does in outlining the facts of a case. In this case, they found the rationale for dismissing the case did not apply, and remanded it back down for further proceedings and it should go to trial.
And there is no such thing as a 4-judge panel that makes rulings at the Courts of Appeal - it is either a 3 judge panel, or the Court hearing it en banc with all members. This author does not know what they are talking about across the board - the headline and content of the article in its entirety is false, right down to the most basic knowledge of how the court is constituted and court procedure.
Kind of useless at this point, since they’ll make the next one a mandatory bird flu jab—and this hasn’t addressed that.
As if “legal” has anything to do with it. Tyrants don’t care much about “legal”.
“At this stage” was key ... the court said that their ruling was specific only to the appeal at hand based solely on the limited information at hand, and further said that a definitive ruling on the issue of traditional-vaccine-or-not would have to be adjudicated based on a complete presentation of ALL of the evidence both pro and con ...
The cHickens are coming home to roost. I was just talking to a military friend of mine today and he expressed his regret over getting the jab. He got the J&J but still regrets ever getting it. Another friend of mine was “injured” by the jab and lost his job. The military refuses to compensate him. Every single person and organization that mandated that poison needs to go to jail.
So the EUA is cancelled right?
Unfortunaly one of the most overruled courts
This will not stop the diehard lefties from getting annual boosters.
When out and about it’s easy to spot a lefty simply because they are wearing those stupid masks.
And many in society were trained to and still social distance when in a line.
If my memory is correct, a few months back Fauci admitted he just made up the social distancing and mask wearing crap.
And to think they were revoking medical licenses to doctors who wouldn’t tow the line on the ‘vaccine’? Beware of govts because govts always F’ things up and destroy freedom.