Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shadowlands1960
... devils in the details... as a superior court they can choose to hear it... right?

Correct, by writ of certiorari, mandamus, scire facias, or prohibition. In at least one case SCOTUS has heard a case by "common law certiorari", which would be constitutionally illegal IMHO, probably because they were ignorant of what the common law permitted the use of the writ of scire facias, but I digress.
46 posted on 07/01/2024 8:23:32 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin

Do you think this ruling opens a can-of-worms re: official vs. unofficial acts or does enough to define the difference? If it doesn’t do so it seems Congress will have to define those parameters...


52 posted on 07/01/2024 8:26:00 AM PDT by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson