Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPJ

I wonder if states could pass a law in their own state that their elected leaders are not allowed to vote to accept “electoral votes” from states where all precincts do NOT have livestreams of the election tabulation process through the whole time that votes are being added.


35 posted on 06/17/2024 12:14:46 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

After the Supreme Court refused to hear the case from states objecting to the states who didn’t follow their own legislatures’ laws regarding elections, it is clear that the only check and balance that the rest of us states have to the fraud happening in the dem-controlled states is the vote to either accept or reject what they call an “electoral vote”. If enough states committed to rejecting “electoral votes” that don’t have protections against fraud, or that don’t fit the Constitutional definition for “electoral vote” (chosen in the manner prescribed by the state legislature), it could force states to actually do what they’re supposed to be doing but there’s “no controlling authority” to MAKE them do.

I’d appreciate any input from legal eagles or others.


36 posted on 06/17/2024 12:22:18 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson