They considered the case on it's LEGAL MERITS, which is what they are tasked to do.
SCOTUS is not my religious leader, nor my ethics teacher.
It's is about time they stick to the law and the Constitution.
Scotus should always rule on Constitutional and legal grounds rather than on what a Justice or Nine Justices consider Moral.
The Law is not about Ethics, Morals, Feelings, etc. It is what it says it is specifically.
In the beginning a man listened to a woman and look where it got them. Today, we are doing the very same thing we have been warned about since the beginning.
Fixed it. Abortion is not "treatment" or "reproductive care".
If voters in individual states, decide that women can have their babies killed, under whatever circumstances outlined in the various state's laws- Pro life will have to continue making their case, that women should let their babies live.
The reason "abortion" is controversial is because, in reality, it IS baby killing.
Calling it what it is, defines the issue clearly.
Examples:
Should a woman be able to have her baby killed up to the moment of birth, (or even after), when the baby can feel pain?
(Should "doktors" be able to make profits off of the sales of the babies body parts?)
OTOH:
Shoud a woman be able to have her baby killed if her life is edangered from the pregnancy, or if she was raped, or is the victim of incest?
The abotion pill kills the baby, but in the earliest stages of development. Should women be able to kill their babies this way? The states have to decide.