What part of attacking STRATEGIC ASSETS of another country is not an act of war? The Neocons wanted a war, and they are now VERY LIKELY to get that war.
The next lesson they’ll learn is that there will be very little left of the West after exchanging nukes with Russia (the Neocon wet-dream), and perhaps the Neocons can hide effectively from the incoming H-Bombs, but they’ll find that their cell phones will no longer work and even if they did, their families won’t be around to answer them.
Jeez, calm down, Bob
Let me repeat - THERE WAS NO SUCH ATTACK
If there was, Russia would be confirming it
Can you find any story confirming this alleged attack?
Of course not, because there are none ... there was no attack
STOP PANICKING OVER NOTHING!
And these Uke assclowns claiming there was no strike. There is no doubt they struck the nuclear air base in Saratov and one other.
Imagine if Russia or a proxy struck a US Airbase where nuclear bombers are based.
“What part of attacking STRATEGIC ASSETS of another country is not an act of war?”
What part of attacking another country is not an act of war? Is there some level of attack on another country that isn’t war? What’s your threshold for a non-strategic alliance attack on the US?
The Neocons think they have luxury accommodations reserved in an underground bunker.
They forget that they will never get there in time.