+1
Granting cert and hearing Bush v Gore has created a century of future mischief.
The process of appointing Electors and separate voting by Electors in State capitals was DESIGNED ON PURPOSE to exclude the national government from potential draining of the swamp by the People in their States.
They thought of everything.
The court got half that case right — the decision on the merits of the legal challenge. The court went off the rails with the remedy in that case, not the merits.
But a question regarding the 14th Amendment is justicable, moreso with State governments relying in part in Section 3.
You cannot be unaware Bush v Gore was a legitimate SCOTUS decision reeling in a rogue state supreme court, as SCOTUS has done in the past, and not unironically will do so at present by overturning Anderson, et al v Griswold, CRSCC, Trump, et al; or do you support this Colorado rogue state supreme court decision?