Posted on 01/25/2024 7:59:51 AM PST by Heartlander
The FBI overstepped its constitutional authority when agents searched hundreds of safe deposit boxes without warrants in 2021, a federal appeals court ruled. The court compared the FBI’s tactics to the kind of indiscriminate searches that led to the enactment of the Bill of Rights in the first place.
In March 2021, the FBI raided U.S. Private Vaults, a safe deposit box company in Beverly Hills, California. The company marketed its services around client anonymity and privacy, which appealed to gambling rings and drug operations, but also customers who were unable to get a deposit box at their bank or simply mistrusted banks and preferred to store their valuables elsewhere.
The FBI seized millions of dollars in cash from the deposit boxes, plus a mix of jewelry, personal effects, and documents such as wills and prenuptial agreements.
In litigation filed in federal district court in May 2021, victims of the raid argued that the FBI’s search “flagrantly” violated their Fourth Amendment rights. In October 2022, the trial judge ruled there was no Fourth Amendment violation.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the lower court’s decision on Tuesday. The court ruled that the FBI exceeded the bounds of a warrant obtained prior to the raid, which explicitly did not authorize any “criminal search or seizure” of the boxes’ actual contents.
The FBI’s warrant application omitted key details of the raid plan, including that the special agent in charge had directed agents to open every box, preserve fingerprint evidence, inventory the contents, and have drug dogs sniff all cash.
“If there remained any doubt regarding whether the government conducted a ‘criminal search or seizure,’” the 9th Circuit ruled, “that doubt is put to rest by the fact the government has already used some of the information from inside the boxes to obtain additional warrants to further its investigation and begin new ones.”
At oral argument in December, one of the three judges on the 9th Circuit panel called the FBI’s search of each safe deposit box without probable cause “egregious” and “outrageous.” Another likened the FBI’s actions to the maligned “general warrants” and “writs of assistance” issued in colonial times, which authorized British officials to search colonists’ homes indiscriminately for smuggled tea and other items.
The 9th Circuit’s opinion repeated these concerns. The court found it “particularly troubling” that the government “failed to explain” why its arguments “would not open the door to the kinds of ‘writs of assistance’ the British authorities used prior to the Founding to conduct limitless searches of an individual’s personal belongings.”
“It was those very abuses of power, after all, that led to adoption of the Fourth Amendment in the first place,” the court ruled.
Five days after being grilled at oral argument, the government tried to make the case go away without a precedent-setting ruling that the FBI’s actions were unconstitutional. Government attorneys filed a motion asking the 9th Circuit to give the plaintiffs what they wanted: an order to destroy records of the FBI’s search.
The government had fought against destruction of the records for more than two years, and plaintiffs’ attorneys were surprised by the about-face, which they called an attempt to “sweep a massive constitutional violation under the rug.”
The government did not, however, concede that the FBI’s raid was flawed. Instead, the government told the 9th Circuit that it wanted “to avoid a published judicial opinion impugning the actions or good faith motivations of law enforcement in this highly unusual case, in which a company was aiding criminality and protecting criminals by operating a vault of anonymous safe-deposit boxes.”
On Tuesday, the 9th Circuit issued the ruling the government feared, while also ordering the FBI to destroy records of the search, including copies in its evidence databases.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California declined to comment on the specifics of the ruling. “We are prepared to destroy records of the inventory search, which is the relief sought by the plaintiffs,” said Thom Mrozek, the office’s director of media relations.
“Today’s opinion draws a line in the sand,” said Rob Johnson, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, the libertarian nonprofit representing the plaintiffs. “If this had come out the other way, the government could have exported this raid as a model across the country. Now, the government is on notice its actions violated the Fourth Amendment.”
It took a court this long to determine that taking property from innocent people and keeping it is not lawful? What a COS.
That the FBI criminally overstepped has been obvious since the first news reports on this incident.
What is shocking is that the 9th circuit called them on it. The 9th is a deep state court.
Of course no lawbreakers will be held accountable. Recall the phony FISA warrants. And so it goes in a shithole banana republic.
Did the people get their stuff back?
More damage done. And no repercussion for the law breakers.
Not that they broke the law. Not they are corrupt. But they “overstepped”....like it was an accident.
An enormous & welcome surprise coming from the 9th circus...
Satisfaction requires that all government personnel, at all levels, involved in these seizures be arrested, tried, and imprisoned with the J6 political prisoners...
Clearly, this FBI & WH action constitutes “insurrection”...
Book’em Dano...
I know of this type of business from a few people who use one.
After I read of this fiasco in California, I shared the articles with them, however I don’t know how they reacted to the story.
In the case of the business I know of, here’s how it works;
The facility is family owned and in business for many many decades.
It has a level four Federal Reserve vault, which can sustain one atmosphere even while 40’ under water, if there was flooding.
No ID is required to open a box. One simply pays cash to avoid a paper record, though they accept credit cards. You give WHATEVER name you wish to use, provide a signature and a password. When a person I knew wanted to open a box, they wanted to use the name Elmer Fudd, but it was already taken, as was Yosemite Sam and similar “names”. No real address is required to be given.
This is not a bank, therefore, no tax man will show up, as is the case with a bank safe deposit box, upon the death of the owner.
The box owner is given a key to the box and the business has a key, just as with bank safe deposit boxes.
When you want to access the box, they provide a small slip to fill out, with NAME, BOX NUMBER, SIGNATURE. These must match what is on file at the facility. Then they allow you into the vault, where you use your key for the box, they use their key, open the door and ONLY you grab your box and are taken to a private room. They DO NOT touch your box.
Very secure facility.
Completely anonymous and out of reach of the tax man, because there are no official records.
One person I know who uses it has two beneficiaries, each with only partial information and they don’t like each other. One beneficiary knows the name and signature and the other knows the box number. The estate attorney has the duplicate key, with instructions that he must be there to open the box and only upon executing the will/trust, but even her doesn’t have the other information. This way the beneficiaries can’t collude together to access it. Pretty smart!
I thought about using the facility, however, I don’t have much of value to secure and became concerned after learning of this California raid, so I didn’t pursue it.
Hope this explanation helps.
What about the illegal evidence they used as a basis to investigate and charge others with crimes? And what about all the property they illegally seized? Doe it have to be returned, also?
This is a prime reason that civil asset forfeiture has to end.
The Nutty Nine Circuit has begun to regain legal sanity, especially since Trump made appointments of good men and women to it.
Meanwhile, who was the FBI Director in 2021 that authorized or allowed this grave misuse of justice in the Vault case?
Try the grossly incompetent Christopher Wray who is one of the worst Bureau’s directors in its history.
Time for this fool to go to Happydale for a long rest.
Those FBI agents are criminals. Arrest them.
When a police officer causes the death of an individual they are often tried for the crime. Why are these FBI agents not being charged with burglary and thief?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.