-PJ
The Preamble defines who is a natural-born citizen.PreambleWe the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"We the People" are the citizens of the United States. "Our Posterity" are the natural born who follow -- the children of We the People. The Constitution was "ordained and established" to "secure... Liberty" to its citizens and their children.
Whom else was the Constitution established to secure, if not the citizen People and their citizen children?
How else would the Founders attempt to secure the United States of America if not by limiting the qualifications for the highest office to the People and their Posterity that was the reason for establishing the Constitution in the first place?
That language seems plain enough to me. The whole Constitution must be read within the context of the purpose as stated by the Framers in the Preamble: the Constitution was framed specifically to ensure the country to its people and their children - the natural born of the country.
If you are an alien who becomes a naturalized citizen, you become one of We the People, and then your children that follow become the nation's posterity.
Natural-born citizens are the nation's "posterity" that the Constitution was ordained and established to secure.
If you are an alien who becomes a naturalized citizen, you become one of We the People, and then your children that follow become the nation’s posterity.
Not an issue.
The issue is babies born here which are natural citizens, but their parents are foreigners and therefore they have the right to be citizens of other countries. That means they are not natural born US.
I've posted my definition of "natural born citizen" that uses the words of the Constitution many times before:The Preamble defines who is a natural-born citizen.
PreambleWe the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"We the People" are the citizens of the United States. "Our Posterity" are the natural born who follow -- the children of We the People. The Constitution was "ordained and established" to "secure... Liberty" to its citizens and their children.
The Preamble was added to be draft of the Constitution by the Committee on Style.
The Preamble exercises absolulely no force as law.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/pre-1-2/ALDE_00001234/
The U.S. Constitution: PreambleThe preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/pre-1-2/ALDE_00001234/
Pre.2 Historical Background on the Preamble[excerpts]
The initial draft of the Constitution’s Preamble was, however, fairly brief and did not specify the Constitution’s objectives. As released by the Committee of Detail on August 6, 1787, this draft stated: We the People of the States of New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina, South-Carolina, and Georgia, do ordain, declare and establish the following Constitution for the Government of Ourselves and our Posterity. While this draft was passed unanimously by the delegates, the Preamble underwent significant changes after the draft Constitution was referred to the Committee of Style on September 8, 1787. Perhaps with the understanding that the inclusion of all thirteen of the states in the Preamble was more precatory than realistic, the Committee of Style, led by Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania, replaced the opening phrase of the Constitution with the now-familiar introduction We, the People of the United States. Moreover, the Preamble, as altered by Morris, listed six broad goals for the Constitution: to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The record from the Philadelphia Convention is silent, however, as to why the Committee of Style altered the Preamble, and there is no evidence of any objection to the changes the Committee made to the final version of the Preamble.
[...]
Nonetheless, there is no historical evidence suggesting the Constitution’s Framers conceived of a Preamble with any substantive legal effect, such as granting power to the new government or conferring rights to those subject to the federal government. Instead, the founding generation appeared to view the Constitution’s prefatory text as generally providing the foundation for the text that followed.
The 14th Amendment is a statement of United States citizenship law for all persons born in the United States, without regard to the status of their parents. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
All persons naturalized are alien born and made citizens through a legal process at some time subsequent to birth. Only aliens, lawfully in the country, are eligible. Illegal aliens, unlawfully in the country, are not eligible. Freedmen after the civil war were not eligible because they were not aliens.
The Fourteenth Amendment did not change the citizenship law. It restated the law as it was after the Declaration of Independence. Should any prior law be found which one interprets to be inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, such interpretation is struck down by the Fourteenth Amendment. All persons born in the United States, and subject to United States law, are citizens of the United States by virtue of United States law. It does not say all persons with certain types of parents, it says all persons subject to U.S. laws. Those not subject to U.S. laws include officiallly accredited diplomats, or visiting royalty, enjoying what is called diplomatic immunity. Children of illegal aliens, born in the United States, are subject to United States laws.
The United States cannot make Indian (India) citizenship decisions, just as India cannot make United States citizenship decisions.
The very concept that another country could make a decision about the citizenship of a child born in the United States that would be binding on the United States leads to absurd results. The Duchy of Grand Fenwick could pass a law granting natural born citizenship all non-Blacks born in the United States. Only Blacks would be eligible to execute the office of the President. Similarly, Israel could pass a law granting natural born citizenship to all non-Jews born in the United States. Only Jews would be eligible to execute the office of the President. We do not allow foreign nations to determine who is, and who is not, eligible to be President.
https://constitution.findlaw.com/preamble.html
The preamble is not technically a legal document, so the ideas contained within it are not enforceable in a court of law. But, it serves as a reminder of why the Constitution was written — to create laws around justice, defense, liberty, and prosperity for the United States.[...]
the Preamble was not the subject of any extensive debate at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, having been added to the Constitution as an apparent afterthought during the final drafting process.
[...]
In the years following the Constitution's enactment, the Supreme Court of the United States cited the Preamble in several important judicial decisions, but the legal weight of the Preamble was largely disclaimed. As Justice Joseph Story noted in his Commentaries, the Preamble never can be resorted to, to enlarge the powers confided to the general government, or any of its departments.
The Supreme Court subsequently endorsed Justice Story's view of the Preamble, holding in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that, while the Constitution's introductory paragraph indicates the general purposes for which the people ordained and established the Constitution, it has never been regarded by the Court as the source of any substantive power conferred on the federal government.